Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric who wrote (40116)	5/26/2013 12:02:16 PM
From: Wharf Rat	Respond to of 86356

There is no "public club". Well, kinda sorta, and it doesn't meet in the Global Doomsters Lost the Argument Building. May 21, 2013, 1:39 p.m. WASHINGTON – Global warming and clean energy should be priorities for Congress and the president, a majority of Americans said in a recent survey. In the survey, released Tuesday by Yale and George Mason universities, 70% of American adults say global warming should be a priority for the nation’s leaders, while 87% say leaders should make it a priority to develop sources of clean energy. Those support levels have dropped by 7% and 5% respectively since fall. Six in 10 Americans want the U.S. to reduce greenhouse gas emissions regardless of other countries’ emissions efforts, according to the survey. Only 6% say the U.S. should not reduce its greenhouse emissions. latimes.com

To: Eric who wrote (40116)	5/26/2013 2:04:07 PM
From: Maurice Winn	2 Recommendations Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 86356

That's doubtful: < the vast bulk of the scientific community rejects your thoughts! There is no "public club". But keep trying. That's what science is all about. Darwin did not let criticism and the church stop him from publishing his landmark book. > Apart from the fact that science is not about fake consensus, they don't reject my thoughts. They don't know what my thoughts are. Some of them will reject some of my thoughts but they'll agree with others. There is a private club of peer review which was used by the Jones and Mann Made Warming gang to preclude publishing and worse, funding is not available to people who think Global Doomsterism is false. Watts Up With That and others publish lots of things. I publish here. It's notable that the Alarmist Doomsters are unable to argue the case. That's why they lost. They make ignorant abusive comments and ignore the opposing argument, thinking that they have automatically "won". That's why they lost. Alarmists are now wringing their hands because they can't get the public to buy their rubbish and because nature has rejected their models too and temperatures are out the bottom of the graphs and snow in late May gives the lie to the idea that children won't know what snow is. Mqurice