SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: i-node who wrote (717900)5/27/2013 11:31:37 AM
From: bentway  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583506
 



To: i-node who wrote (717900)5/27/2013 11:36:42 AM
From: bentway1 Recommendation  Respond to of 1583506
 
3 Dozen Quakes Shake Arkansas —in Week

EXPERTS CAN'T RULE OUT FRACKING CONNECTION

By Rob Quinn, Newser Staff
newser.com
Posted May 27, 2013 2:58 AM CDT | Updated May 27, 2013 5:00 AM CDT

(NEWSER) – Fracking is in the spotlight once again following a swarm of at least three dozen earthquakes in central Arkansas over the last week, CNN reports. Experts say they believe the quakes—the strongest of which was 3.5 magnitude—are natural, but they haven't ruled out a connection with natural gas exploration involving hydraulic fracturing in the region. Though two dozen of the quakes have hit near Morrilton, Arkansas, four different areas in the state saw activity.

"Right now all we've gotten reports of is shaking stuff and rattling shelves, but people are definitely noticing them," an Arkansas Geological Survey scientist says, describing the chances of so many quakes in the state in such a short time as "Powerball kind of odds," but noting that the closest injection wells to some of the quakes are eight miles away. "I can't say at this time there's not a connection, but given the distance from those wells, it would be pretty amazing." Another swarm of mild earthquakes in the next county over ended abruptly two years ago after a moratorium on new injection wells was imposed.



To: i-node who wrote (717900)5/27/2013 6:29:38 PM
From: Alighieri  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1583506
 
I think what you're missing here is that these RATES depend on a certain number of healthy people signing up for the programs, and there is considerable doubt as to whether people will do so.

I am not missing anything because, unlike you, I am reading nothing that is not in the article.

Al