SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Wharf Rat who wrote (40251)5/29/2013 3:06:41 AM
From: Maurice Winn4 Recommendations  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 86356
 
Just because there's a travesty doesn't mean they'll give up the cash flow once they are on a roll. They'll continue to loot the public until the public gets sick of it and the snow accumulates.

By "your theory" I did not mean you personally developed it. Just that it was yours in terms of your faith in the dogma. Religious adherents normally don't invent their theories themselves. They just adopt them and believe in them.

Some believe in Scientology and some believe in Global Alarmism. The cash flow and profit from the CO2 faith is vastly more profitable. Both like to use the word "science" in their liturgical traditions.

This is presumably about something you are making up, but it's a bit of a puzzle what you are on about: <So you think oceans are 2 dimensional, and don't transfer heat from molecule to molecule all the way down? An interesting theory, currently in disagreement with 17th, 18th, 19th, 20th, and 21st Century physics. You should write it up and submit it to your garbage can. Then, you can write an identical paper about a 2 dimensional atmosphere. > I don't know where you got the idea that I think oceans are two dimensional or what theory you think I should write up. I did mention ocean but that was in relation to Global Alarmist diversion to heat in the ocean now that heat in the atmosphere is not obliging.

Mqurice