SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : NNBM - SI Branch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: abuelita who wrote (87083)5/30/2013 8:55:40 PM
From: Wharf Rat  Respond to of 104218
 
California's goals

Identify the statewide level of greenhouse gas emissions in 1990 to serve as the emissions limit to be achieved by 2020

I've gone from filling up 2 or 3 times a week to once a month. I make clean electricity and sell it to my utility, a negative carbon footprint. I've already done my share for California.

:>)

But... I'm talking with the school district about how to give them about a 2 KW system yesterday, or 2 months ago. I've got the $, but the details remain to be worked out with the superintendent and her faithful administrative assistant the Mall Rat right after graduation. Nobody is gonna outgreen my state if I have anything to say about it.



To: abuelita who wrote (87083)5/30/2013 11:14:58 PM
From: koan  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 104218
 
I agree about the need for stasis, but without population control nothing else much matters, and we will end with a simple (but horrible) population crash caused by global warming, disease or simple pollution, if nothing else.

And from what I see we are breeding much faster than we can educate the kids?

But, my kids are not as worried about it as I am, so maybe I don't see the out?


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News