Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Greg or e who wrote (36798)	5/31/2013 5:55:38 AM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Dawkins admitted Piltdown man was a fraud & there were scientist that were skeptical from the beginning. It was 1920, transitioning from a victorian age when most all the science techniques were still getting their footing & even mounting the first large scale fossil digs. Frozen in a tiny fixed world of pixie dust & fables not to know all the literal 1000's of other examples of studies that support the transitional nature of specied life from all the kingdoms & classifications in evolutionary biology? That stringy whiney broad sister Wendy brought up two examples & thought she was producing a case of doubt when science itself has evolved & expanded to include knowledge of billions of galaxies beyond our own & trillions of worlds& you think a proposal/theory such as this "life in flux" would be impossible or strange too?

To: Greg or e who wrote (36798)	5/31/2013 5:56:33 AM
From: 2MAR$	Respond to of 69300

What is completely strange is with all the evidence one would choose not to believe that 65mil yrs of change & adaptation just within our local branchings of the tree did occur. You were already presented the fossils we have found since Piltdown man idiot, even back then in 1920s we had the findings in Africa of a Australopithecus and many many more finds since then. Actual bones & skulls not drawings as that lying creationist was trying to propose, and thats the real rub that puts everyone at risk, how people are so shameless they would choose lies over the truth? Perhaps its an animal thing, yes, that would fit nicely as good sister Wendy here comes off as an animated chimp trying to bullshit her way thru the interview, which is just so painful to watch. You have to love her for what she is but listen to her tone, what a condescending ignorant wench for all to see. She asks for material evidence & we do have massive overwhelming physical evidence but apparently she doesnt have more than an 8th grade education?