Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Politics of Energy -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alastair McIntosh who wrote (40360)	6/1/2013 6:04:13 PM
From: Brumar89	Respond to of 86356

OK, you googled some studies which mention polar + amplification + climate but don't address the question asked. Let's pick one of your googled links and look at it: If long-term trends are accepted as a valid measure of climate change, then the SAT and ice data do not support the proposed polar amplification of global warming. onlinelibrary.wiley.com I note it isn't based on climate models but on observations, so it doesn't address the question, to whit: can you produce a source for " the computer models predict that the temperature difference will increase from global warming?" And it also doesn't speak to the equator to pole difference increasing or decreasing. It does seem to say the common alarmist claim that the arctic is the fastest warming place on earth is baloney. Can you point to some computer models that predict that this temperature difference will decrease from global warming? Why would I even want to? I challenged you to support your assertion about the climate models and so far you haven't been able to do so.