Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Buy and Sell Signals, and Other Market Perspectives -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (51135)	6/2/2013 9:16:24 PM
From: Fintas	2 Recommendations Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 220737

You as the moderator can ban me, ignore me or take it to the PM. I'm surprised you didn't take it to the PM. Come to think of it Seismo could have taken it to the PM. Again I did say from the GET GO. I was PLAYING! I read it as a suggested prediction. Later he clarified it as a range. It was NOT conjecture. If it were I would have let it pass. I suggest you re read my response to him initially. I threw in dates and I also said I was PLAYING! Why do I care about numbers. Because I do. Just as many care when a Prechter or similar puts up a number or makes a statement that is not reasonable. Be concerned when posters do not care. Then we can go back to the WHAT DIFFERENCE DOES IT MAKE. Let's just say anything and then defend it. . As for spx next move. I doubt the 1645. It's possible but I doubt it. 1620 was a pivot for me so I would expect it to try to get there. Possible bounce before or hit and bounce. Yet regardless 1620 will go and then back to 1602/1584. Filling that GAP UP. Have a good eve. If you decide to ban me that is your choice. But as long as I post I will do so to be open/honest and objective. Fintas