Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : ahhaha's ahs -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: ahhaha who wrote (23444)	6/5/2013 12:40:29 PM
From: Ron Dior	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

So what's wrong with it? Non-Sexy = ZZZZZZZZZZZZZZ Gov. has too much control over their destiny. Give me a biotech or tech with a great product /pipeline and good leadership any day.

To: ahhaha who wrote (23444)	6/5/2013 12:45:38 PM
From: DMaA	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

Doesn't it depend on your investment goal? If you are retired looking for safety and income a 14% yield doesn't look too bad.

To: ahhaha who wrote (23444)	6/5/2013 12:55:07 PM
From: deeno	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 24758

Well there have got to be a bunch of people across SI that have all sorts of opinions on small oil and gas ideas. But I fail to see how using common stock metrics would have any value in what seems to be a royality trust. I shied away from trusts as they seem to be self liquidating assets. High current rate low residual value. Tracks oil pretty close and my view of oil is similar to gold as far as my expectations as well as my ability to time them. Nice to be talking about ideas though.