Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Incorporated (QCOM) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Jim Lurgio who wrote (5995)	12/6/1997 8:57:00 PM
From: qdog	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 152472

I don't know that I want to touch this Jim!! FWA........hmmmm....... Forget Washington assholes!! Forage when able... For women aliens!!! Gee, I don't know. As to the put's; I have never been one not to take advantage of bulls outrageous behavior. I do always advocate some protection at certain times for more sophisitcated investors. My present thinking is $85 by mid Jan and then a pull back to 80 or high 70's. Of course I've been accused of being conservative in other threads that advocate extremes in short order without fundemental backup. I'm more realistic than altruistic in that regard. My idea of present day hell is to be in a room with MSFT bulls telling me that they are worth the valuation the investing community has given them. Bullshit!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where is the fundementals such as asset value, intrinsic value, etc, etc,etc. IT's one reason I disagree with most that call for a stock split. I just don't see it happening in the short term; talk to me in April.