Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : International Precious Metals (IPMCF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Eric Tai who wrote (29022)	12/6/1997 8:29:00 AM
From: Wildcat	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 35569

Eric, First I saw IPM's name then I saw Charter's then I hit next. From your post I assume their was nothing with regards to IPM. I have learned in the past that naysayers(to put it politely) do not have an inside private track to news. If Charles, Chucau, Matt, Lew or you posted it, then I would assume it could be valid. Also, Ron Struthers said a financing in some form would be forthcoming and some said he was wrong. Well... Wildcat

To: Eric Tai who wrote (29022)	12/6/1997 10:24:00 AM
From: E. Charters	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 35569

Well Eric, I guess I couldn't fool you. But it is an interesting piece on the gold market and the financing realities in general. And if slimy Pete cannot raise money without stealing it I don't know where IPM or any other gold company can get money nowadays. Don't you think that was the point of the Hunter S. approach. It is one thing for a company to say they have signed a PP with a broker, another thing to collect. My point is perhaps IPM has those problems. There is a point where brokers will face reality and realize there is no more sucker money to suck up the shares.