SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: koan who wrote (45484)6/9/2013 5:01:27 PM
From: longnshort5 Recommendations

Recommended By
average joe
FJB
greenspirit
Oblivious
Sdgla

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
The ghost of Columbia University


Bloggers have been repeatedly told to leave the questions about President Hussein Obama's background alone. Sorry, but I disagree. Henry Graff - a history professor at Columbia when I was there, and now retired - is a big name. I don't believe I ever took a course with him (I was a political science major), but I remember him well. And if he's willing to go on the record saying these kinds of things about the President of the United States, the time has long since passed to take a serious look at whether the President has been lying to us.

But until now, I was the only one publicly voicing my suspicions. That just changed in a big way. Meet Professor Henry Graff, perhaps the most legendary and honored professor ever at Columbia University. He was THE American History and Diplomatic History professor at Columbia for 46 years. And he is more emphatic than yours truly that there are no Obama footprints at Columbia.
I was put on Professor Graff’s trail by another Columbia classmate, skeptical about Obama’s story. He told me that Professor Graff had been the speaker for the Class of ’53 last weekend at Columbia. My friend was watching Graff answer questions from the crowd when he was asked about Obama at Columbia. Graff said, “I have my doubts he ever went here.”
I did some digging and located Graff’s home phone number. I called him yesterday. Now retired, he was delighted to hear from me. He agreed to go on the record about Obama. Unlike Obama, Professor Graff clearly remembered me. He was thrilled to hear from his former student. I was in several of Graff’s classes and he remembered me like it was yesterday. He sounded great- like he hasn’t lost any of his trademark sharpness in 30 years since we last met.
I was honored to learn that this legendary historian has been following my political career for many years. But he had no such cheery things to say about the President. Graff said, “I taught at Columbia for 46 years. I taught every significant American politician that ever studied at Columbia. I know them all. I’m proud of them all. Between American History and Diplomatic History, one way or another, they all had to come through my classes. Not Obama. I never had a student with that name in any of my classes. I never met him, never saw him, never heard of him.”
Even more importantly, Professor Graff knew the other history and political science professors. “None of the other Columbia professors knew him either” said Graff.
Graff concluded our interview by saying, “I’m very upset by the whole story. I am angry when I hear Obama called ‘the first President of the United States from Columbia University.’ I don’t consider him a Columbia student. I have no idea what he did on the Columbia campus. No one knows him.”
There is something wrong with Obama’s story- I know that. Many of my classmates at last weekend’s 30th reunion knew that. Now the most beloved Professor ever at Columbia joins us in publicly questioning the story. Obama is either the ghost of Columbia, or the perfect Manchurian candidate. But something smells rotten at Columbia.



To: koan who wrote (45484)6/9/2013 6:39:44 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
How can you possibly explain more votes being cast than there are registered voters????

It's ipsofacto evidence of massive fraud.



To: koan who wrote (45484)6/9/2013 7:33:30 PM
From: sm1th1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 85487
 
Number of convictions???

<<
At LEAST 4500 cases of vote fraud in one city back in 2005. This stuff is rampant everywhere Democrats rule.>>

I'll bet less than 5!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1111

So if 1 person falsifies 10000000000 votes, that only counts as 1 case of fraud?

When 1 nut kills 20 people, why isn't that reported as a single murder?



To: koan who wrote (45484)6/11/2013 5:08:35 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Congressman Joe Garcia’s chief of staff implicated in phantom absentee-ballot requests scheme

By Patricia Mazzei pmazzei@MiamiHerald.com
Congressman Joe Garcia’s chief of staff abruptly resigned Friday after being implicated in a sophisticated scheme to manipulate last year’s primary elections by submitting hundreds of fraudulent absentee-ballot requests.

Friday afternoon, Garcia said he had asked Jeffrey Garcia, no relation, for his resignation after the chief of staff — also the congressman’s top political strategist — took responsibility for the plot. Hours earlier, law enforcement investigators raided the homes of another of Joe Garcia’s employees and a former campaign aide in connection with an ongoing criminal investigation into the matter.

“I’m shocked and disappointed about this,” Garcia, who said he was unaware of the scheme, told The Miami Herald. “This is something that hit me from left field. Until today, I had no earthly idea this was going on.”

Jeffrey Garcia, 40, declined to comment. He also worked last year on the campaign of Democrat Patrick Murphy of Jupiter, who unseated tea-party Republican congressman Allen West. Murphy has not been implicated in the phantom-requests operation.

The Miami-Dade state attorney’s office, seeking electronic equipment such as computers, served search warrants Friday at the homes of Giancarlo Sopo, 30, Joe Garcia’s communications director; and John Estes, 26, his 2012 campaign manager. Neither Estes nor Sopo responded to requests for comment.

A third search warrant was also executed, though it wasn’t clear where.

Joe Garcia said he would likely put Sopo on administrative leave for the time being.

The raids marked a sign of significant progress in the probe that prosecutors reopened in February, after a Herald investigation found that hundreds of 2,552 fraudulent requests for the Aug. 14 primaries originated from Internet Protocol addresses in Miami. The bulk of the requests were masked by foreign IP addresses.

It is unclear if the requests from domestic and foreign IP addresses are related to the same operatives.

The Miami Herald found that the ballot requests were clustered and targeted Democratic voters in Garcia’s congressional district and Republican voters in two Florida House of Representatives districts, indicating a concerted effort by a mystery computer hacker or hackers.

Only voters, their immediate family members or their legal guardians can submit requests for absentee ballots under state election laws. Violations may be considered third-degree felony fraud. Using someone’s personal information — as required in online ballot-request forms — may also be considered a more serious, first-degree felony.

None of the identified requests were filled because the elections department’s software flagged them as suspicious. But had they slid by, campaigns would have been able to direct phone calls, fliers and home visits to the voters to try to win their support — if not attempt to steal the ballots from unsuspecting voters’ mailboxes.

Miami-Dade State Attorney Katherine Fernández Rundle said her office has targeted absentee voting, which she considers problematic, both through the criminal investigation and “active advocacy’’ seeking to change laws in Tallahassee and at County Hall.

“Historically, absentee voting is the source of all voter fraud,” she said in an interview, crediting The Miami Herald for its investigation.

Fernández Rundle convened a grand jury last year that reviewed policies for voting by mail and recommended that the elections department step up its security for online requests. County commissioners are scheduled to vote Tuesday on a resolution sponsored by Commissioner Esteban “Steve” Bovo directing administrators to implement the recommendation.

Friday’s searches raised the specter of another crime in the already scandal-plagued election for Congressional District 26, which extends from Kendall to Key West.

The Miami Herald found that the first batch of requests, which originated from at least two Miami-area IP addresses last July, targeted Miami-Dade Democratic voters in the congressional district where Garcia was running in the primary against Gustavo Marin, Gloria Romero Roses and Justin Lamar Sternad. Later batches using foreign IP addresses targeted Republican voters in the two Florida House districts.

Garcia won the primary and later defeated incumbent Republican David Rivera in the general election.

Though Garcia bested Rivera by about 11 percentage points, and Democratic President Barack Obama won the district by about seven points, Republicans still view Garcia as vulnerable. Three GOP challengers have already announced plans to run against him in 2014.

One of them, Miami-Dade School Board member Carlos Curbelo, pounced on Friday’s news.

“Joe Garcia has to come clean immediately and tell the public if his campaign is involved in absentee ballot fraud,” Curbelo said in a written statement.

Last year’s tumultuous primary resulted in a separate, federal corruption investigation into whether Rivera had ties to Sternad’s illegally funded primary campaign. Rivera has denied any wrongdoing.

Congressman Garcia said he will hire Coral Gables attorney William Barzee, a longtime campaign contributor, to investigate the phantom-ballot scheme internally and cooperate with prosecutors.

As communications director, Sopo received a salary of $12,744 between Jan. 17 and March 31, Garcia’s congressional office records show. He was not paid by Garcia’s campaign last year, though his company, GS Strategies, received $33,450 in 2010 when Garcia lost his congressional bid to Rivera. Sopo also worked on Garcia’s failed 2008 campaign against Republican U.S. Rep. Mario Diaz-Balart.

In 2012, Garcia’s campaign paid Estes $44,395 through his company, Estes Consulting. Between 2010 and 2011, he was paid $5,770 by the Florida Democratic Party.

A woman who would not give her name but identified herself as Estes’ mother answered the door at the family’s Westchester home Friday afternoon. She acknowledged that investigators had searched the house earlier in the day but said she did not know what they were looking for.

Neither Estes nor Sopo worked in the Republican primaries for Florida House districts 103 and 112, where voters were also targeted with the phantom absentee-ballot requests. It is unclear what, if any, involvement they could have had in those races.

District 103 stretches from Doral to Miramar; District 112 from Little Havana to Key Biscayne.

The Miami Herald found that 466 of 472 phantom requests in Congressional District 26 targeted Democrats. In House District 103, 864 of 871 requests targeted Republicans, as did 1,184 of 1,191 requests in House District 112.

During the primary, the campaign of Romero Roses, one of Garcia’s rivals, raised concerns about odd absentee-ballot requests in the race.

The phantom requests were first revealed in December by the grand jury examining absentee voting. Prosecutors said they could not track the hacker behind the requests because they were masked by 12 foreign IP addresses. But The Herald reported that they had not obtained information showing three additional domestic IP addresses as part of their initial inquiry, due to a miscommunication with the elections department.

A day after the Herald brought the domestic IP addresses to their attention in February, prosecutors said they would examine the ballot requests. At least two of the IP addresses were in Miami and could likely be tracked to the mystery hackers’ physical addresses.

Read more here: miamiherald.com