SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Systemsoft Inc. (SYSF) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Robert Scott who wrote (2683)12/6/1997 2:16:00 PM
From: David R. Lehenky  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3529
 
Robert, I would consider SYSF doubling in 1998 as a bare
minimum. I'm really thinking a $1/sh earnings next year,
which would produce a share price much higher than $12.50
a share. Even if SYSF does *not* sign up a single additional
OEM for SysWiz next year, they should ship somewhere around
7 - 8 million units. Even at $4 per unit (the lowest number
used on this thread), the earnings are > $1/sh. Since the
core business has been able to pay the bills this year, I am
comfortable with assigning all SysWiz royalties to earnings.
This completely ignores things like the Sykes deal, USB, and
any retail product they produce from SysWiz (remember, the COO
came from 11 years at Lotus - she knows retail channels and
Fortune 1000 enterprise accounts).

-Dave Lehenky



To: Robert Scott who wrote (2683)12/8/1997 12:10:00 PM
From: Dokie  Respond to of 3529
 
Robert,
Don't take my "chart analysis" so seriously. I was just trying to point out that most of the analysis based on SYSF products and fundamentals have been dead wrong and that looking at SYSF trajectory over the past 12 months has been more informative. What you missed from my tongue-in-cheek note is that the analysis of this company by virtually everyone on this thread and professional analyst elsewhere has been so very wrong. Nonetheless, I think the likes of the the famous investors you mentioned knew when to get out of SYSF a long time ago. This has been lesson for me because it has made me realize that getting at the truth about a company is extremely difficult for the small investor. What is public knowledge doesn't count for much particularly when it comes to small tech companies.



To: Robert Scott who wrote (2683)12/9/1997 8:14:00 PM
From: patrick k chase  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3529
 
I beg to differ. I bought sysf at 4.5 pre-split, and
sold at 9 pre-split. At that time the P/E was in the
high 80's, and I felt that the stock was symply to expensive
to hold on to. Too bad I sold out so soon- it continued to
rise to 30 pre-split, before it has had its relentless
decline. Good thing I sold out when I did!, except that
I bought into Seagate, which has decined in half its
value since. Hightech is symply too manic for me. I've
made the decision to go back to putting my money in boring
mutual funds- at least in the long run I come out ahead.