To: tejek who wrote (720925 ) 6/12/2013 9:23:37 PM From: one_less Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580449 "Who is the 'we' to which you refer?" Educated people, who are not blinded by the stupidity of partisan subservience. Start here>>click the link and read the article. It has become commonplace to identify that certain children in this modern complex society are "at risk" of failing to succeed in life because of the adversities of their young lives. Poverty, family discord, violence, substance abuse, and illness are among the hazards. Policymakers worry not only that such children stand little chance of reaching their potential as adults, but also that they are likely to become so dysfunctional they may not be capable of self-support or rewarding relationships with others. Children become identified as at risk because of both biological and environmental factors (Honig, 1984), although it must be noted that biology and environment ar not entirely independent. Chief among the biological factors are congenital defects and low birth weight, which are more likely when low income mothers fail to get adequate nutrition and medical care during pregnancy. Similarly, children of drug-addicted mothers may be born with serious physical and emotional problems that are really environmental in origin. Children who are born healthy may join the ranks of those at risk because of poverty, family discord and disorganization, violence and abuse, substance abuse, numerous siblings, parental mental illness, or parents with minimal education. These environmental conditions disrupt the care giving process as parents become less able to provide either the structure or the love that are so important to the development of self-esteem and diligence. The concept of risk has been common in the medical field. It has only recently entered the language of education (Jens & Gordon, 1991) and is frequently misunderstood. While risk implies the potential for negative outcome, it also suggests that negative outcome may be avoided. In this article, we discuss resiliency as it refers to positive outcomes in at-risk children, review studies that have helped identify how and why some at-risk children prosper in spite of risk, and consider the specific protective or buffering factors that prove helpful to these children. worldwideopen.org