To: wmwmw who wrote (1538 ) 12/6/1997 12:50:00 PM From: Robert Graham Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 12617
***Off Topic*** The exchanges I have seen on SI, and sometimes on threads here like this one, has reminded me of the kind of individuals that can be found here on SI. There are many knowledgeable, and generous people here. This is in the tradition of the Internet and what makes the Internet work. Unfortunately, SI also seems to have its share of very mean-spirited, invalidating individuals, and many of them even narcisisstic. But I doubt if many of them are successful at what they do in the market. Of course, not to say Wang Wei is the latter, but I will leave it open for the rest of you here to determine how much if at all he is described by the former of my statements here. Also, I find that the above two observation of mine go together much of the time. After one month interacting with others here at SI, I thought I was a "piker" with my 35% return per year of longer term investments of 6 to 9 months. I also thought my first foray into option trading back several months ago was a failure, since less than half of my picks worked for me. But I still made money by knowing when to get in and out of the option. I still was ahead by a non-trivial amount. And this includes successfully finding ways to get reliable fills on my limit orders due to MM pursuing their own agenda in the illiquid options market. Since then, even though I have allot to learn about the various aspects of the markets, I found out that I did not do so bad. It is just that there is allot of talk here on SI. Reminds me of the "pump and dump" shops that I have heard about. Nothing really behind what was said. Just the interest of the few (one in my example) in conflict with the interest of the many here at SI. And I do not think this is what SI is about. There is one element I find in common with all of these invalidating people on SI, posing themselves as "expert" at the cost of others who some if not many are even more knowledgeable and experienced than they are. They have a tennuous connection with what occurs around them. For instance, they do not stop and observe and think of all the different types of people who participate in SI. I am talking about financial analysts, fund managers, market makers, desk traders, brokers, newsletter authors, CEOs of companies, and so on. There is an incredible experience level that many represent here on SI, and many of these individuals are here to contribute as much or more than they take away with them. So there are *many* experienced and knowledgeable people watching their behavior in how they handle themselves, and perhaps that number is in the thousands. But this sort of person goes on with their game and at the same time not understanding how they are coming across to all the other people who are reading their posts. But they feel good having validated themselves at the expense of someone else. This is their not so hidden agenda, even though it actually may be hidden to themselves. It is as though these people are living in a room which isolates them from the rest of the world. But they continue to "act out" instead of opening the door and walking out to where the rest of the world is, to see and meet with their audience. I am shure what they would see would surprise them and even alter their behaviour. I am shure they would behave differently if all of these people were in the audience in an auditorium, and they were on stage to see their audience looking back at them; for them to know who their audience is and for them to know that their audience knows who they are. But then I suspect this is what they want to avoid, and a part of them understands this. So they keep their eyelids shut as they walk through their life. And the Internet makes this allot easier for them to do by allowing them and their audience to be faceless. Amazing that this can happen! This is very unfortunate. For I beleive everybody here , including them, can be that generous person I talked about earlier who has worthehil contributions to make. So I encourage everyone to participate in this thread, both the experienced and the inexperienced alike. I also request that those lurkers out there participate too. You out there know who I am talking about. ;) I suggest that you will get out of this experience as much if not more that what you put into it. Questions contribute ss much as the answers do, and can be considered more important because without questions you do not have answers. And of course, I know this sometimes does not feel to be true, but there are no such things are "stupid" questions, except perhaps to those individuals that I have talked about who invalidate others. But I believe there are some of us here that can take care of them for you! :) Bob Graham