Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Ride the Tiger with CD -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: hoov who wrote (229243)	6/13/2013 5:43:01 PM
From: toccodolce	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 314173

Hi Lar, I believe Zen is a lump/vein graphite deposit and not flake. Is this correct? And are flake and lump/vein graphite competing in the same space for PBR, Li-Ion batteries, and graphene? I'm getting reading on conflicting reports based on where said reports are generated from. For example, if you read reports from proponents of flake graphite they state that flake graphite is the only one capable for PBR, Li-Ion batteries and graphene. You get the opposite from the Zen homepage and their supporters. Just wondering what your take is on this matter. TIA, R

To: hoov who wrote (229243)	6/15/2013 7:50:16 PM
From: hoov	4 Recommendations Recommended By 99FXD copperknob longbeard Rocket Red Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 314173

It has come to my attention that Simon Moores reads SI, and replies on Twitter. I wouldn't want you to miss this, Simon, as you apparently have missed each of my tweets to you on Twitter itself, asking for rationale/evidence for your negative inferences about Zenyatta. Frankly, I consider your behaviour to be, at the very least, passive-aggressive, as you attempt to control the discussion by selectively giving attention to, or ignoring, posts as you see fit. Well, here is a post from TCC, this evening. Quote: I think it was the tweet where you called him a turkey. Just for clarity, I did not ever tweet that he was a turkey. I sent 6 tweets in reply to Moores on twitter on the morning of the 13th, but he did not reply. At 4:43 that afternoon, I posted on SI, calling both Moores and Fulp turkeys. I honestly did not recall even using that language, until it was pointed out to me today. I apologize for intemperate language, but having someone raise a straw man argument and then ignore reasonable questions about it is provocative in its own right. I became frustrated. Interesting, is it not, that he was willing to reply to my SI post, but not to my tweets, asking for evidence? IMHO, he remains poultry until he provides evidence for his allegations against ZEN. Lar