To: TobagoJack who wrote (101057 ) 6/14/2013 6:56:31 PM From: Maurice Winn 1 RecommendationRecommended By average joe
Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 217942 Amusingly, the more Big Brother tries this and that to denigrate Edward, the more they look like lying idiots. <"High-School Dropout Snowden Is Lying" Chairman Of House Intelligence Committee Claims > Perhaps other drop-outs like $ill Gates, Steve Jobs and many others should be embarrassed about not being academically approved to be among the illustrious graduate drones working in the bowels of Big Brother. If Edward is lying, it should be remarkably easy to demonstrate the lies. It seems very unlikely that Edward is lying or even wrong. When character assassination is the best they can come up with, they are losing the argument. <"He was lying ," Rogers said. "He clearly has over-inflated his position, he has over-inflated his access and he's even over-inflated what the actually technology of the programs would allow one to do. It's impossible for him to do what he was saying he could do." "He's done tremendous damage to the country where he was born and raised and educated," Ruppersberger said. Asked how much additional information – including other FISA verdicts – Snowden has in his possession, Rogers said, "No one really knows the answer to that today. I think we will know the answer to that shortly." > What tremendous or even minor or even trivial damage to the USA did he do Herr Adolf Ruppersberger Nazi? I think I'll take the word of somebody called Edward Snowden over somebody called Ruppersberger. Rogers also seems remarkably uninterested in the point under discussion, which is Big Brother versus freedom and the Individual, and prefers to ponder the precise access that Edward had. If Rogers is correct that Edwards access was not much at all and best ignored, then what's the problem and why the world-wide interest? So far, credibility ratings: Snowden 10, Rogers/Ruppersberger 0. Mqurice