To: Alighieri who wrote (721134 ) 6/13/2013 10:24:36 PM From: i-node 2 RecommendationsRecommended By d[-_-]b FJB
Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1579141 He said this when he met bush, before the war. It was not infighting...it was an observation that a man whose first allegiance was not to the US saw as an opportunity... Here's what Scott McClellan said about bush in his book...this was a loyalist mind you from way back in Texas. So, now you're citing an Obama supporter. No one in Bush administration would consider McClellan a "loyalist"; although they probably THOUGHT he was loyal when he was there. What real evidence is there Bush is anything but highly intelligent? He certainly is far more intelligent and competent than Barack Obama. I cannot imagine any objective person suggesting otherwise. Hell, Obama's mismanagement has overrun his administration -- and this is mostly crap that happened during his first term that he managed to obscure until after the election. Obama's approval is back in the mid-40s, and surely consists of the same group that has held him there the entire time -- hard leftwingers and selected minorities. As all these facts have come out, it is clear Obama is running the country on automatic pilot; you have incompetence throughout the biggest government agencies, unchecked. You have this Lois Lerner taking the 5th, yet, she stays on the payroll and they [today] fire her underling. Do you think GWB would tolerate that crap? He would told her to pack her crap and get the hell out. As the president should do. I know Obama can do no wrong in your eyes. But he is NOT anywhere near GWB's level of intellect or competence, and it isn't a close race. Of course, Bush was a great president in many respects, and comparing with him is a high bar. But Obama is worse than Carter, and that is saying something.