SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (37565)6/18/2013 3:17:11 PM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
Darwin’s Doubt is an intriguing exploration of one of the most remarkable periods in the evolutionary history of life -- the rapid efflorescence of complex body plans written in the fossils of the Burgess Shale. In laying out his case for intelligent design (ID) based on this evidence, Meyer has emerged from the “ID wars” of the past decade as perhaps the most thoughtful and engaging advocate of this controversial perspective. No matter what convictions or beliefs one holds about evolution, Darwinism or intelligent design, Darwin’s Doubt is a book that should be read, engaged and discussed. - Dr Scott Turner, SUNY

See more at: evolutionnews.org



To: Brumar89 who wrote (37565)6/18/2013 6:27:01 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 69300
 
clear evidence that all of the phyla that existed today, and even more, had emerged suddenly and at the same time, around 530 million years ago

Everything is certainly clear as far as the usual lies & distortions go, what we know if you want to wander into the realm of the factual is that most all Cambrian era life was aquatic. Land plants were entirely absent from the scene so it seems life has been doing a lot of ‘evolving’ in the last 500 million years?

Lets try get real here your "clear evidence" is stunning in its simpleminded in its mistating the facts of the Cambrian era & what followed, there's not a shadow of doubt of the fossil record whatsoever .



To: Brumar89 who wrote (37565)6/19/2013 8:22:59 PM
From: RMF1 Recommendation

Recommended By
2MAR$

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
2 MARS$ seems to have answered you adequately, so I'll just put up HIS response once again.

Message 28958455

Brumar, you don't seem the type to believe the earth is only 6000 years old.

What EXACTLY do YOU believe?