Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (37585)	6/18/2013 9:41:19 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Why so lost? Once again real slow for you --->most all Cambrian era life was aquatic and land plants were entirely absent from the scene, so what have we seen life doing the last 500 million years? Alot of evolution seems to be going on, you have the entire colonization of land plants & mammals, are you that stupid?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (37585)	6/18/2013 9:44:58 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

that neo-Darwinian explanations for the Cambrian Explosion have failed miserably. New data acquired in recent years, instead of solving Darwin's dilemma, have rather made it worse. Meyer describes the dimensions of the problem with clarity and precision. What specifics? How amazing this site you quote from always mentions these "precise" specifics but always fails to mention even one? (big lol)

To: Brumar89 who wrote (37585)	6/18/2013 9:51:44 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 69300

And lastly, almost every internet site now allows for free follow-up discussion except your EN.org which has no space assigned for viewer comments or debate after any cr@p article they choose to grind out? Then they whine how such challenges they imagine themselves posing go unment but would bet you in an instant any of these scientists would be more than glad to respond on the site, immediately, to all their bullshit but surprise----> *no discussion allowed!* And we are not surprised are we? Now lets see you evade that observation, i am only pointing out the glaring obvious lack of openess or transparency.