SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Brumar89 who wrote (37682)6/20/2013 5:08:42 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
80-90% of the people arent going to ever finish that book , this i know already and this isn't about Cambrian radiation either, if you want to prove ID you might as well refer to the anthropic principle of the universe and stick with that.

Common sense tells us theres all the prehistory building up to the Cambrian that will account for this in the end, and then theres always the question of where this intelligent designer is in relation to his creation. It doesnt sound too plausible they choose to tinker at one particular age rather than at any other time, and that conveniently in the distant 500mil yrs ago.




To: Brumar89 who wrote (37682)6/20/2013 5:15:18 PM
From: 2MAR$  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 69300
 
Also think its a complete distortion to say that evolution must always take place with slow & gradual steps,it could just be that in the more primitive staged bodies where theres more active hunting , motility , prey & predator scenarios for the first time, life evolves very rapidly. And evolving of sensory organs/eyes that really bring on the changes and we don know the atmosphere & other factors such as sea composition were drastically changing too.

the greater mystery of all besides this flap in the Cambrian would be the farther back transition from uni~cell life to multi celled animals & plants in any case, we do see the evolution of plants quite clearly & animals since that age.