SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: sm1th who wrote (46521)6/21/2013 9:58:23 AM
From: miraje2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Jorj X Mckie
Thehammer

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
You said that 350 PPM "was the most that we can stand".

It amuses me that the same liberals who profess to love the poor and middle class, are promoting "global warming" policies that if implemented, would destroy jobs and drive millions more around the world into poverty.

The only realistic way to lower CO2 levels to some arbitrary 350 PPM level would be to utterly disassemble modern economies. The world's economic engines run on carbon based energy (as well as some nukes and hydro), not windmills and pipe dreams, and will do so for many decades to come.

Rich greenie elites really don't give a damn about the hoi polloi rabble they profess to care so much about, despite their mouthing platitudes to the contrary.



To: sm1th who wrote (46521)6/21/2013 12:16:33 PM
From: koan  Respond to of 85487
 
350 PPm per million is the most we can stand over the long term. Good lord. This problem is not instantaneous. But pretty quick.

Can you think a couple of years ahead? Probably not.

And we are not all quite healthy. The arctic ice pack has almost melted and events like S andy are probably the result of that sort of thing.

<< Please enlighten me. You said that 350 PPM "was the most that we can stand". It is well above that and yet we all seem to be quite healthy. If, as you warmists insist, 350 PPM is the end of the world, how are we able to have this conversation?