Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technology Stocks & Market Talk With Don Wolanchuk -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (83053)	6/21/2013 11:19:12 PM
From: da_cheif™	Read Replies (4) \| Respond to of 206860

straight up........watch the red line....above it is a vacuum.......clx chit is ready and its a bradley turn date......

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (83053)	6/21/2013 11:30:13 PM
From: Fintas	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206860

And as I have explained my work says it's a bounce will end due to numbers. Isn't that what most of us are doing. Using some technique or method to determine what we conclude is going to occur and then implementing a strategy. My numbers are based on % and ranges and other. It is no different than understanding one can not build a skyscraper straight up. There is a SEQUENCE. Or how do you know it will topple?. Because the numbers say it will topple without support etc. Those with experience would not ignore the numbers. Those that ignore them watch things topple or often blow up. BP was a classic ex of someone ignoring NUMBERS. The issues being discussed this past week are based on NUMBERS. Too many react to my words when it is clear even to you that you have ranges with your vp, buy sell etc. I'm not reacting to your words or you. I understand what you are saying. Even if I do not agree at times.. What I would focus on is does what I present it make sense and if it does consider it. If it doesn't ignore it. That is why I suggest pnfers look at a pattern using many value boxes to help them understand my work. Yet again we BOTH saw the BOUNCE in GOLD off 1335. We BOTH saw it FAILING. I don't understand why the focus on the word BOUNCE and failure. You HAD to SEE FAILURE for you to SEE the retrace UNDER 1300. the FAILURE was based on your model. Here and now my WORK supports the spx rallying. I use term bounce for I do NOT support the rally going straight up to 1944. I see the rally in spx failing. Just as I did recently as it failed to take out 1656/1660. When it does fail I see the continuation down to 1566. I get that pnfers from 1620-54. Those who understand what I have been presenting from 1458 you will see the sequence of 54 x 3 from the 1620. Time will prove the number wrong or correct. Regardless. You asked and I explained. Fintas

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (83053)	6/22/2013 12:11:32 PM
From: SGJ	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206860

Another 1000 pt bounce is alright by me..:-)

To: GROUND ZERO™ who wrote (83053)	6/24/2013 10:04:46 AM
From: Turtles_win	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 206860

I woke up one day and suddenly, I found I could predict the past! Wow. Looks like an intermediate term correction. So, my guess is in the Investor's Intelligence sentiment survey, this will be over when %bears > %bulls, which might be painful. Sad, Sad, Sad that there are so many that finally just got into the market after staying out after the big hit 4/5 years ago or so. Anyway, GREAT CALL! Should be a great buying op here before too, too long. CBOE equity put/call ratio will probably have to get up around 1.0 for a few days near the bottom.