Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TobagoJack who wrote (101392)	6/23/2013 1:00:46 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 218784

Being judged within a realm of Virtuous Victorian Values is an excellent idea, rather than by Big Brother. <could have chosen no better > I can think of no better place. Hong Kong's Kiwi judges and other international judges will not simply throw Edward to the wolves or foxes guarding We the Sheople. The USA's legal case seems pathetic at best and criminal at worst. Stealing USA government property? They might enquire about missing umpty$billion in Afghanistan, not to mention right there in Washington. Stealing government information? Perhaps they are confusing copyright breach with theft, but he has not sold copies of the information but has merely reported on the information. Just as the USA FBI "stole" things from New Zealand in the Kim Dotcom case, but they deny it, Edward could quite reasonably do as the FBI did in the case of Kim Dotcom. When the FBI turns themselves in and returns the property, maybe they could ask Edward to return their information too. Or at least copies of it. What was the other silly charge? All in all, they are struggling to come up with something. Perhaps he "stole" a memory stick or something, which is really more of an employment dispute rather than theft. It seems he could claim some payments from Booz and co for breach of contract in directing him to conduct illegal activities such as acting as a co-conspirator with criminals such as Clapper, Obama et al. In fact, Edward could reasonably claim major damages awards from Booz and the co-conspirators for putting him in an invidious employment position. There also seems to have been a lot of defamation of his character and reputation such as Cheney's defamatory remarks. In British-based jurisdictions, such defamation can lead to large claims for damages for harm to one's reputation. Perhaps Cheney and other slanderous and libelous people would like to be extradited to Hong Kong to answer the charges of defamation and effect payment in settlement of the damages claims. Mqurice