Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Apple Inc. -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Doren who wrote (155849)	6/27/2013 7:20:13 PM
From: John Koligman	Respond to of 213177

Around 340 would put AAPL near Microsoft's market cap, and if you factor in cash levels for both, Mr. Softie would be valued quite a bit higher than AAPL... MSFT's market cap is currently around 290B, with about 74B in cash and 15B in debt... Regards, John

To: Doren who wrote (155849)	6/27/2013 7:36:17 PM
From: Moonray	1 Recommendation Recommended By Doren Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 213177

Moonray's graph and Henry's reading seems to indicate 340 to 360. Doren, I give very little credence to the Preliminary Price Objective showing on the P&F charts that I post. Very seldom do they turn out to be "predictable" turning points. They are formed by the "explosiveness" of the graph as it is formed. You can think of it as the price the "X" or "O" would coast to, if future forces did not come in to play. However, for 50 years I've used the P&F charts in conjunction with other things because the charts are pretty good at showing support and resistance areas. I am no longer looking for an inverted head-and-shoulders pattern on AAPL. My feeling is that the time for it came and went when we recently failed to hold $420: o~~~ O

To: Doren who wrote (155849)	6/27/2013 7:57:42 PM
From: Ryan Bartholomew	1 Recommendation Recommended By sylvester80 Respond to of 213177

Moonray's graph and Henry's reading seems to indicate 340 to 360. If we end up with an inverted head and shoulders that would seem about right as a head would have to be lower than this "shoulder" That also implies we would suffer another dip after this next low. Aigh.... but my palm-reader is saying 320 and my astrologist is saying 380. I'm so confused which "woo" to believe in! I'm starting to think that with plummeting sales forecasts, employee attrition, the stigma the devices now carry, and impending price/margin cuts, that declining profits might actually be a better justification to think a fair valuation is below 300... but it wouldn't be as fun to ignore all the magic!