Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Evolution -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (38453)	7/1/2013 7:48:44 PM
From: Greg or e	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Ya, but if it doesn't get many facebook likes, then it can't contain any truth; can it?

To: Brumar89 who wrote (38453)	7/1/2013 8:45:08 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Central theme still remains the same, that such intricacies of the cell cannot have evolved without guiding hand. Regardless of whether this is true or not the exquisitness of the preciseness of these chemical machineries are far from unappreciated by scientists & approaching new synergies of the combinate mechanisms of change are being explored. (physics had to undergo the same types of evolution in understanding relativity too) .As such,to wit, ID will never be accepted & taught as science since whatever the cause for increased complexity is , we find evolution has occured, transitional fossil are there & the signature is indeed in the cell, shared all the way back. The argument of irreducible complexity seems & is utterly self defeating ,such examples have been proven as such. One wonders if the same amount of penetrating thought were devoted to understanding the message of God thru his Son might be the better employment of time? That seems to be the really illusive problem here, far more than evolution of complexity.

To: Brumar89 who wrote (38453)	7/1/2013 10:11:30 PM
From: 2MAR$	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 69300

Central theme of Meyers still remains the same, that such intricacies of the cell cannot have evolved without guiding hand. Regardless of whether this is true or not the exquisitness of the preciseness of these chemical machineries are far from unappreciated by scientists & approaching new synergies of the combinate mechanisms of change are being explored. (physics had to undergo the same types of evolution in understanding relativity too) .As such,to wit, ID will never be accepted & taught as science since whatever the cause for increased complexity is , we find evolution has occured, transitional fossil are there & the signature is indeed in the cell, shared all the way back. The argument of irreducible complexity seems & is utterly self defeating ,such examples have been proven as such. One wonders if the same amount of penetrating thought were devoted to understanding the message of God thru his Son might be the better employment of time? That seems to be the really illusive problem here, far more than evolution of complexity. *had to repost for you to respond after gregoree's vagaries & you having the open mind should watch this & pass it onto your friends .. The Bible Unearthed