To: Emile Vidrine who wrote (9747 ) 12/7/1997 1:09:00 AM From: Jane Hafker Respond to of 39621
Dear Emile. This is about the strangest barrel the Lord has put me over in years. I sure hope it is His Perfect Will that all this goes on in broad daylight, because we're talking some heavy stuff here, and things that are almost unknown except to advanced social history freaks and conspiracy theory experts. And I hope you realize not one person in ten even believes in a conspiracy of any kind, so you are really stepping out on a ledge, and taking me with you, I might add, but that's o.k. I know that you are not going to compromise 1/16th of an inch on this, and I know we're getting closer and closer to a test of the utlimate compromise resistance here one year soon down the road, and all of this is true, but Alan is my friend, and.....Emile, Alan is Jewish, and his wife is Jewish and his children are Jewish, his relatives, and everyone in his nuclear universe, now just how do you think he's going to take a blanket indictment of the entire Jewish nation. Knowing Alan, not too happily, as you see. You want to stand for truth as you know it, and cannot and will not compromise with the enemies of Jesus Christ, which most everyone would agree at this point is about the whole world except for us born agains, and this is right, but to alienate a brother in Christ, Alan, who does love Jesus, seems wrong. Surely we, and I mean this in the purest sense of we who do love God and believe in His Son as our personal Savior, can find a better way to drop nuclear bombs about history--which happened, which no one can really deny because it is in fact true-- on someone a little easier than to open fire on them with two massive torpedoes designed for total overkill. And that advanced knowledge of history is rather like a low-yield nuclear weapon dropped on someone's head. How is anyone supposed to know this stuff if they haven't been sleuthing it out for years? That's some heavy history you're laying on him. Or even the brothers on the thread. Emile, I know you are calling me on compromise when we can have none, but again, what good is Jesus's life and death if we can't ever put on the brakes just a little until a critical situation has passed, and reason can replace anger. Personally, Alan has a point of balance that he is trying to make here with us. And between your loyalty to Jesus Christ and your utter devotion to no compromise whatsoever with the gospel of Jesus Christ and Alan's own experience to date with Christianity gone mad, I believe the Holy Spirit would like to do something here if He can. Remember that we were all warned that things would get so crazy and so hard to sort out that if God did not shorten that time, even the very elect would hardly make it. I hope Alan doesn't mind my speaking for him, but he is my friend, and I believe if he or anyone else thinks they hear something which is not being said at all, they will not, and cannot in a state of anger, ever hear what is being said. And he is saying something that I can hear. And I know why he is angry. We're just drifting toward one of the dead elephants again, and that's good. If Alan wants to talk about it, he will. I'm going to leave this to our Lord to sort out, and He can.