Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Blue Chip Gold Stocks HM, NEM, ASA, ABX, PDG -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: cmg who wrote (45340)	7/3/2013 12:14:34 PM
From: Fintas	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 48092

Some want to control thought, up or down. As well as who is ALLOWED to contribute. If you are a bull on a bull site. YIPPPPEEEEE.. If you are a bear on a bear site..YIPPEEE. Let someone with a bearish view show up on a bull board and KILL THEM.. OR let a bull show up on a bearish site and YUP..KILL THEM. Let an investor show up on a traders site and then pepper them with silly questions. Have you ever invested. DUH. I was buying gold when it was in the 167 range. Perhaps as one who is a PERMA BULL but has NO problem with seeing downside, the issue is not with those who are bearish or bullish but the individual that is not able to debate and support. I'm no bear re gold for I've a long term target into the 2900. Which I can support technically and with FA. But I can sure as heck present data that said when it was at 1900 it was going first to 1412 and then 1220. Then when GOLD puts in a near term low at 1180 say ok that same data says oversold but more may be there. The bull trader only wants to see the BOUNCE to make that fast trade and fast buck with %. COOL.. THE INVESTOR says not so fast. YES GOLD was a buy at 385 but a better buy at 300 to then sell much higher. OR more recently to those who bought it at 1450, isn't 1220 a better price? ANY FOOL can say going to 3000. Just as any fool can say going to 450. And heck the boards are replete with those who caught a bounce and made 100%-200%. The question is can they do it consistently? The question is how does one derive those numbers and can they support it with work of FA. While doing so the test of one's skills is performance. And as you note not the number of posts one puts up.. Expect the retest of the recent lows. It's coming. IMHO Fintas