SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: d[-_-]b who wrote (724274)7/3/2013 5:01:32 PM
From: Bilow  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575239
 
Hi d[-_-]b; Obviously, the absence of DNA evidence that Zimmerman pulled the trigger is proof that Zimmerman didn't pull the trigger.

-- Carl



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (724274)7/3/2013 5:19:30 PM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1575239
 
I think Martin shot himself, he didn't want to go back to Dee Dee, who would, be like married to michelle. Two cows



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (724274)7/3/2013 5:32:19 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
Bilow

  Respond to of 1575239
 
Heh, the absence of DNA means that a person didn't touch the thing ... that's what the liberals are saying. Therefore if Zimmerman's DNA wasn't on the trigger, he couldn't have pulled the trigger. I know CJ, tejek, Shep would all agree.



To: d[-_-]b who wrote (724274)7/3/2013 5:39:58 PM
From: J_F_Shepard  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1575239
 
Is DNA often found on the trigger of a gun.....? His DNA was all over the gun...Martin's was not.