Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (724294)	7/3/2013 5:26:52 PM
From: longnshort	2 Recommendations Recommended By d[-_-]b joseffy Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575187

FL Prosecutor indicted for falsifying arrest warrant against George Zimmerman owens 8 1575

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (724294)	7/3/2013 6:33:45 PM
From: Bilow	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1575187

Hi J_F_Shepard; Re: "You are aware that Zim said Martin had his hands on his mouth and his nose to try and stop him for calling for help......Zim's buddy testified to that and it's in his book... " There's several good reasons that hearsay evidence typically isn't allowed in court. Why don't you think of a few of them. Re: "Are you suggesting that there was absolutely no blood on Zim's face when Martin was doing that?" Nose bleeds are internal to the nose. When you're on your back, the blood goes down your throat. We all know this. So maybe there wasn't much blood on Zimmerman's face at that time. Re: ".......no blood touched Martin?" Of course I don't know if blood touched Martin's hands. I don't know if the blood washed off in the rain. I don't know if the examiners missed what blood was there. But any of these things could explain a negative DNA result. Negative DNA results are very common in forensics. I provided you links to forensics articles noting this. I showed you earlier that women are raped and DNA tests come back negative. Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence. DNA is used to prove contact, lack of DNA cannot be used to prove lack of contact. Lack of DNA has lots of explanations. For example, when DNA is used to absolve murderers, it happens not because "no DNA was found", but instead because "someone else's DNA was found" which is incompatible with the accused. -- Carl