Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (724894)	7/6/2013 12:15:45 PM
From: jlallen	3 Recommendations Recommended By d[-_-]b FJB Machaon Respond to of 1577252

Truth hurts, eh KOD? Face it.....Odumbo is a DISASTER as President.

To: tejek who wrote (724894)	7/6/2013 12:24:00 PM
From: jlallen	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB Machaon Respond to of 1577252

Obamacare called ‘The fiasco for the ages’ By Wesley Pruden The Washington Times Friday, July 5, 2013 Nancy Pelosi told us there would be days like this. The only way to find out what was in Obamacare was to pass it and see what happens. A democrat dominated Congress passed it, the messiah signed it, and we’re beginning to see what happens. Barack Hussein Obama and the gang that can’t shoot straight aren’t having much fun, but if they think they aren’t having fun now, just wait. The “best” is yet to come. The best the Democrats can say about Obamacare is that it’s an approaching train wreck, in the memorable description of Sen. Max Baucus of Montana. Mr. Baucus was one of the authors of the legislation and now he’s hurrying home to Montana for good, anxious to avert his eyes from all the hair, teeth and eyeballs soon to be scattered along the railroad right-of-way. Pundits and professors are rifling through the thesaurus, looking for the right word to describe what the Wall Street Journal calls “a fiasco for the ages.” The Journal editorialists reminded everyone that they “fought the Affordable Care Act from start to passage, and we’d like to apologize to our readers. It turns out we weren’t nearly critical enough.” The editors of The New York Times, Mr. Obama’s most reliable sycophants, are deep in mourning, but working furiously to apply more rouge to the corpse before it turns the parlor too fragrant for a wake. It’s summer, and they’re running out of ice. The “downside” to the delay in implementing the employer mandate is that it gives Republican critics the facts and figures, the “ammunition to portray the health care reforms as a failure,” The Times says. But not to worry, the year’s delay decreed by the president will allow the Internal Revenue Service time to figure out “how this mandate will work … it is more important to do this right than to do it quickly.” It’s ever so reassuring to know the IRS is on the case. washingtontimes.com