Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (725033)	7/7/2013 2:09:30 PM
From: longnshort	Respond to of 1578158

you gonna riot when zim is freed ? at least you could bring some fried chicken and water melons to the rioting blacks, I think they would like that

To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (725033)	7/7/2013 2:15:56 PM
From: Jorj X Mckie	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578158

I have a high school wrestler in my house. And you are right, there is a way to defend against it, If you know what you are doing. So, are you saying that Zimmerman had a wrestling background? Or are you suggesting that he should have flagged down a high school wrestler and got some pointers while he was getting beat on? (as testified by at least one witness) So let's go with the one punch theory. Martin punches Zimmerman once in the nose, hard enough to break his knows and knock him backwards so that he hits the back of his head. At this point, Zimmerman has either been knocked out (however briefly) or is seriously dazed. In his daze he discovers that Martin has mounted him and he cannot defend himself with his fists. Is it reasonable for him to have reached for his gun while in a compromised state? the jury is not stupid. that remains to be seen.