To: Don Hurst who wrote (48143 ) 7/8/2013 8:07:36 PM From: Broken_Clock Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487 What is your explanation for this "unilateral backing of Obama" you seem to find? The D's reelected O despite the fact he has launched the the biggest fascist assault on civil liberties in this country during peacetime in US history. he has codified the worst of Bush II's atrocities. The man sits down to breakfast and muses over a kill list knowing full well he is going to snuff out innocent mwn, women and children. "Certainly, until the very end of his presidency, George W. Bush used his power for targeted killings very sparingly," said Chris Woods, who leads the "Covert Drone War" project at the Bureau of Investigative Journalism. "We're talking about a significant killing program now [under President Obama]. 2,000 targeted killings."huffingtonpost.com === on civil liberties is further right than Bush, or any other President for that matter: Not long after the story into the National Security Administration's spying programme broke, US president Barack Obama insisted the issues raised were worthy of discussion : "I welcome this debate and I think it's healthy for our democracy. I think it's a sign of maturity because probably five years ago, six years ago we might not have been having this debate." In fairly short order, a YouTube compilation appeared , showing Obama debating with himself as he matured. Flitting back and forth between Obama the candidate and the Obama the president, we see the constitutional law professor of yore engage with the commander-in-chief of today. Referring to the Bush White House, candidate Obama says: "This administration acts like violating civil liberties is the way to enhance our security. It is not." Referring to the NSA surveillance program, President Obama says: "My assessment and my team's assessment was that they help us prevent terrorist attacks." Candidate Obama says of the Bush years: "This administration also puts forward a false choice between the liberties we cherish and the security we provide." President Obama retorts: "You can't have 100% security and also then have 100% privacy and zero inconvenience. We're going to have to make some choices." The notion that a president's record might contradict a presidential candidate's promise is neither new nor particular to Obama. And we should hope that politicians evolve as their careers progress and new evidence and arguments come to light. What makes these clips so compelling is that they show not evolution, but transformation. On this issue, at least, Obama has become the very thing he was against. They're not gaffes. These are brazenly ostentatious flip-flops. And regardless of how much they cost him, Obama has clearly no intention of taking them back. ++++++++ On wiretaps and drone strikes, it’s time for liberals to accept that Obama is worse than BushOn questions of “US national security”, from wiretaps to Gitmo to drone strikes, Barack Obama has shown his thinking is even less unenlightened than that of the junior Bush. And liberals everywhere newstatesman.com +++++ On the war on drugs: Judging From Prosecutions, Obama Is 80 Percent Worse Than Bush on Medical Marijuana ++++ ACLU: Obama Worse Than Bush On Civil Liberty Issues | WBNS ... ++++ Wall St?Even Democratic Party Loyalists Starting to Wake Up to the Fact that Obama Is As Bad As Bush … Or Worse Obama Is Worse than Bush In Favoring the Super-Elite, Bailing Out the Big Banks, Protecting Financial Criminals, Targeting Whistleblowers, Keeping Government Secrets, Trampling Our Liberties and Starting Military Conflicts In New Countries http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-is-worse-than-bush-in-favoring-the-super-elite-bailing-out-the-banks-and-protecting-financial-criminals/5327103