Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: d[-_-]b who wrote (725362)	7/9/2013 12:22:09 PM
From: tejek	Respond to of 1580264

Isn't it amazing how one offended person ruins things for everyone else? (Sort of tenant of liberal thinking today that if one person is offended.) Not really a tenant [sic] of liberal thinking. What's a tenet of liberal thinking is protecting the rights of people. And really in some ways wingers agree. Where we disagree is which groups should get their rights protected. On the other hand I do agree the only flags that should fly from public buildings are State and US flags - other flags have no business being displayed. The problem with the parish city councilman in question.........I bet he and the Korean vet wouldn't have had any concerns had it been a confederate flag that was flying over public property. However, I do agree with their conclusion and yours.........only gov't flags should be allowed.