Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bill who wrote (725469)	7/9/2013 6:20:37 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579850

"Obviously you are ignorant of the facts. There was no stalking." FYI Billy, I have watched and listened to every word uttered and all evidence submitted to that court. Since you;re a working man, you can't do that.....you're not jla... " There was no stalking. Following from a distance in order to let the police know where the suspect went is not stalking. It is not against the law, nor is it intended to incite a physical confrontation." You want to call it following, trailing, bird dogging, etc. be my quest..... He did not follow from a distance and testified that he was almost eye to eye in from of the community center.... he then continued to follow after he was told to stop... "Zimmerman's actions, prior to killing Martin, were perfectly legal according to police testimony." yes, PRIOR TO KILLING MARTIN, he was legal except for breaking the rules on carrying as a Neighborhood Watch guy.... After he killed Martin, things were different....