SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Mainstream Politics and Economics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Broken_Clock who wrote (48294)7/9/2013 9:08:55 PM
From: Bearcatbob2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
FJB

  Read Replies (4) | Respond to of 85487
 
"Neither Secretary of State John Kerry nor President Barack Obama could tell you the exact route that the pipeline would travel through countless neighborhoods, farms, waterways and scenic areas between Alberta’s tar sands and oil refineries on the U.S. Gulf Coast."

LOL - the idiot Obama cannot even tell us what he did the night of 9/11. And then there was Kerry and staff - oh yeah - he was on his yacht after all.

Obama and his team is a testament to how bankrupt the D party is for members of stature.

Bob



To: Broken_Clock who wrote (48294)7/10/2013 11:41:59 AM
From: TimF  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 85487
 
Even for an international pipeline, the state department shouldn't have to be involved as long as the other party (Canada in this case) is ok with the pipeline. The EPA deals with environmental issues for the US. The state department would have to negotiate for the pipeline if the US government supported it but Canada's did not, but absent that situation there isn't much good reason to have the state department play a significant role.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News