Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: i-node who wrote (726301)	7/13/2013 6:24:29 PM
From: one_less	2 Recommendations Recommended By FJB i-node Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1578105

I would ask for clarification too. Like, On what basis could we possibly consider this?

To: i-node who wrote (726301)	7/13/2013 6:30:14 PM
From: longnshort	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578105

not necessarily, manslaughter instruct said zim had to show intent, which he didn't. they need to tell the jury he faces 10-30 years. i don't think some on the jury want zim to go away for 10-30 years

To: i-node who wrote (726301)	7/13/2013 6:49:04 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1578105

They want clarification on the manslaughter charge. Yeah, they are trying to figure out which conviction carries the longest jail sentence.

To: i-node who wrote (726301)	7/13/2013 7:45:51 PM
From: bentway	Respond to of 1578105

Typically, when an armed man shoots and kills and unarmed person, they are guilty of AT LEAST manslaughter. Had Zim just taken the "terrible beating" (your fantasy), being put on him by Martin, Martin would be going to jail for assault. I'm an MMA fan, and have seen some TERRIBLE beatings dealt out, but I've yet to see ANYONE die from the blows and submissions from these trained professionals. The only interesting thing is that manslaughter with a gun doubles whatever sentence is handed out in FL.