SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: bentway who wrote (726693)7/15/2013 12:41:27 PM
From: i-node3 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bonefish
joseffy
one_less

  Respond to of 1579750
 
>> Martin's guilt or innocence wasn't at issue. Zimmerman's was.

Exactly. In spite of all the misdirection, the jury saw through it and recognized it as a ruse.



To: bentway who wrote (726693)7/15/2013 1:35:03 PM
From: Tenchusatsu2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Bilow
joseffy

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579750
 
Bentway,
It didn't matter whether Martin was a thug or a priest
BS. It goes to the very heart of whether Zimmerman acted in self-defense.

If Martin were a "priest," the defense would have a much harder time establishing reasonable doubt considering the circumstances.
Murder trials don't depend on the guilt or innocence of the victims. Ask OJ about it.
Nice try, but OJ didn't claim self-defense.

Tenchusatsu


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News