SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: tejek who wrote (726811)7/15/2013 7:34:08 PM
From: Tenchusatsu4 Recommendations

Recommended By
d[-_-]b
i-node
jlallen
one_less

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578511
 
Ted, since you have a hard time keeping a clear line of thought, let me put you back on track.

You think Martin was justified in attacking Zimmerman and starting the physical altercation simply because Zimmerman was following him around.

To you, following someone is aggressive behavior, and according to you (your words, mind you), the "normal physiological response to another person's aggression is to fight or flee."

Hence you think Martin had every right to attack Zimmerman.

This is why your opinion doesn't count, because you think being tailed gives you the right to beat up your follower.

Tenchusatsu



To: tejek who wrote (726811)7/16/2013 12:25:49 AM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1578511
 
>> Martin's behavior was irrational but Zimmerman's shooting and killing Martin was not. Huh? Jesus, what kind of rational thinking is that?

Martin was beating Zimmerman up. That is what make it acceptable for Zimmerman to shoot him.