Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (727078)	7/17/2013 7:21:23 AM
From: jlallen	2 Recommendations Recommended By Bill one_less Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1579893

Some people don't WANT to see what is obvious to those who realize this incident had nothing to do with race...

To: one_less who wrote (727078)	7/17/2013 9:05:43 PM
From: J_F_Shepard	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1579893

"He has the right to carry a gun for self protection which is different than using a gun in the performance of (police) duty. There is no evidence that he ever acted as a vigilante." He had a right to carry if he were not on duty as a Watch volunteer.......he did not have that right and instead broke the rules of the organization..... "Except that it was Trayvon's stated intention, supported by Jeantel's comments (whoop assss), and all the evidence to the contrary, you might have a point. Your contention that there had to be some sort of "fair fight" response is over the top ridiculous." Supported by Jeantel's comments.......are you kidding me??? And you claim some intelligence?? You are so biased and wrong in this affair it's not even worth reading you.....