Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

SI - Site Forums : The History of Silicon Investor -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: shades who wrote (60)	12/7/1997 7:50:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1327

Humbly report, shades, postings of tidbits, giving you ALL the facts, not just part of them - with the REAL numbers: Message 2901448 Message 2901454 Message 2901510 Thanks for reminding me, yours truly, humble mind, Svejk

To: shades who wrote (60)	12/7/1997 11:06:00 PM
From: Josef Svejk	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 1327

Humbly report, shades, the one posted tidbit, that gives us ALL the facts, not just part of them, with the REAL numbers, that I found of interest in what you provided: Message 2663411 I humbly remain, yours truly, picky, Svejk

To: shades who wrote (60)	12/8/1997 12:14:00 AM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1327

Shades, I think we'll have to go to the judges on that one... Oooh, sorry-- that buzzer means the judges have ruled against you. It seems that a thread is defined as "a singular collection of messages starting at 1". Therefore, your attempt at totalling up nine OVIS/RMIL threads and comparing them to one INTC thread has been deemed inadmissable. But please don't go away unhappy. The judges assure me that no short squeeze will take place at RMIL which should virtually assure that at least one of those threads surpasses INTC "real soon now". We thank you for playing our game. (gg) - Jeff