SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/17/2013 9:59:20 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
THE WATSONYOUTH

  Respond to of 1580148
 
Zimmerman and the Jewish Question
.................................................................................................
Times of Israel ^ | July 16, 2013


Hispanic man in America and black youth get into an altercation. Hispanic fatally shoots black. Jury finds him not guilty of both murder and manslaughter because he was acting in self-defence. What has this got to do with the Jews?

Get The Times of Israel's Daily Edition by email and never miss our top stories Free Sign up!

So far nothing. But there are some worrying aspects.

I’ve been following this issue closely; the issue being George Zimmerman, a neighborhood watchman in Sanford, Fla. killing Trayvon Martin, a 17-year-old black youth who happened to wander into a neighborhood one night that had been hit by a flurry of robberies entirely attributed to black youths. One was caught and others were seen by witnesses.

The not guilty verdict triggered an explosion of reactions. Those coming from the side who felt it was unjust, driven mainly by black people, liberals, and celebrities, were unrestrained in their condemnations damning the system, whites including the six women on the jury, and not the least Zimmerman.

One expression keeps popping up all over the place from the Zimmerman haters. The “Jew-Hispanic” Zimmerman.

The father is a Catholic who was a career soldier and saw action in Vietnam. The mother is a Peruvian immigrant. Her grandfather was black, so technically as the Germans used to say, who were as big in describing things in racial terms as is the American mass media, Zimmerman is not “white” but a mischling or crossbreed. He speaks Spanish fluently, a true Hispanic.

Zimmerman’s record is not perfect; he had a few minor scrapes with the law along the way. But he is not a racist. The family used to take care of two African-American girls his age when he was younger and they were like sisters to him. His partner in a failed business enterprise was an African American. The neighborhood he was watching was 60 percent white, 20 percent Hispanic, and 20 percent black. Several of the African-American residents there spoke nothing but praise for him.

When the district attorney and police investigated the incident they came to the conclusion it was self-defence and no crime had been committed. The facts they had, and nothing new has been added, speak for themselves. Zimmerman spotted Martin, a tall gangly black kid, in the neighborhood on a dark rainy night who aroused his suspicion. He called in to emergency services and they told them that they would send someone. He got out of his car, he says, to verify an address. He had no idea where Martin went. Four minutes later Martin appeared, slugged him in the nose, drove him to the ground, and pounded his head on the concrete. Zimmerman says Martin threw several blows, but they were both moving and squirming so how many landed no one can ever say.

Zimmerman screamed for help multiple times. He told the cops that when they first went to the police station. Eight witnesses testified it was he that was screaming. One eye-witness testified it was the black guy on top doing a “pound and ground” MMA style on the white guy on the bottom.

In a bare-knuckles fight you have no idea what is coming next. One blow may glance off a cheek; the next one may break an orbital bone; the next one may be fatal. Zimmerman got hold of his gun and shot. He felt his life was in danger and it was. That’s self-defence.

Who was the victim? Martin had been caught at his school in Miami in possession of several pieces of stolen jewellery, most of them belonging to women but also men’s watches. He also had a burglary tool in his possession. At the point the system let him down. Instead of reporting him to the authorities, in which case he would most likely have been put through the juvenile corrections system and it would have saved his life, the school marked the goods as lost and found because they did not want to record a criminal incident that would look bad on their yearly statistics. He later was suspended on suspicion of using drugs.

Martin’s mother abandoned him when he was 3
. The father took a new wife and she nurtured him for the next 12 years. Then the father tired of her and took a new woman and dumped Martin back with his natural mother. It was this woman, presented to the public as the saintly mother of a martyr, who testified that it was Martin who was screaming. How could she know? She hadn’t been with her son all the time he was growing up. His behavior deteriorated, according to the step-mother, when he was taken from her. The step-mother could have talked about that scream. But she was never asked. She was kept far from the family. Her presence would have exposed the natural mother for what she was: a fraud. And that would have meant no case at all.

Zimmerman had a problem with obesity which he got under control by working out at a gym for a year. He also tried to learn to box. But as his lawyer O’Mara said he only got as far as shadow boxing and he still couldn’t beat the shadow. He was no match for a tough Miami street kid running with burglars and drug users.

The district attorney knew all this; the police knew all this. There was no case.

Enter the racemongers, all the usual suspects: the Black Panthers, Sharpton, and the slimiest attorney-general in US history, Holder.

The Black Panthers were first off the mark and set the tone. One Mikhail Muhammad, self-styled minister for Jacksonville, in a TV interview said that they had discovered that Trayvon had been “assassinated by a wicked white beast” who is claiming now to be an Hispanic but is really “a no-good Jew.” He went on to announce that they had put a $10,000 bounty on the head of Zimmerman. He said they had mobilized 10,000 men dedicated to seeing that Zimmerman and his family will never sleep peacefully again and had received wide financial support for their effort from “athletes and celebrities.”

Given the alacrity after the verdict of “athletes and celebrities” to call for the head of Zimmerman, what Muhammad said may not all have been in his sick imagination.

Next into the mix jumped Al Sharpton, who has long since replaced Bull Connor as the number one racist in America. He enjoys a respectability not afforded to the Black Panthers since he’s given a platform on the far left-wing channel MSNBC.

Sharpton never misses an opportunity to stir up hatred. First there was the Tawana Brawley hoax in 1987 in New York state. An African American girl, aged 15 at the time, claimed she was raped by six white men including a cop who wrote KKK on her body. The problem was that there was no evidence supporting her claim that a sexual assault had occurred.

Not to be discouraged by a total lack of evidence Sharpton jumped in and identified Steve Pagones, a young prosecutor, as one of the rapists and whipped up sentiment against him the way he would later do against Zimmerman, although Pagones was totally innocent of doing anything in a crime that never happened.

In 1991 a Hasidic Jewish driver in Brooklyn ran over a seven-year-old black boy. It was an unfortunate car accident. At the funeral Sharpton seemed to blame all Jews for the accident calling them “diamond merchants.” Riots broke out punctuated by calls of “kill the Jews.” Yankel Rosenbaum, an Australian doctorate student, was stabbed to death by a crowd of 20 blacks. Only two of his killers were ever brought to justice. An Italian tourist, thought to be a Jew, was shot dead.

In 1995 a corporate landlord controlled by black people raised the rent on Freddy’s Fashion Mart in Harlem, owned by a Jew. He in turn raised the rent on a sub-tenant, a music store owned by a black man. A dispute erupted over the rent raise. In jumped Sharpton with a mob to picket Freddy’s Fashion Mart, spitting on customers crossing their lines. Under Sharpton’s incitement, the mob threatened to burn down the store. Finally one of the protesters ran into the store and shot four employees point-blank. He then set the store on fire for a total of seven deaths.

Fast forward to Sanford after it sank in that the authorities were not rushing to judgment.

Neither Sharpton nor the Black Panthers would have had the clout to stampede the authorities into charging Zimmerman with a crime that could not be supported by evidence had not Holder gotten involved. J. Christian Adams, who left the justice department when Holder refused to prosecute Black Panthers who had intimidated voters I Philadelphia in 2008, wrote: “the justice department’s Community Relations Service was deeply entangled in New Black Panther-led rallies and protests in Sanford, Florida, against George Zimmerman. These are the same rallies during which the New Black Panthers called for a bounty on George Zimmerman, and released “dead or alive” posters. The New Black Panther leading the rallies was the same New Black Panther Holder sprang free in the voter intimidation case in Philadelphia.” These are the rallies in which the Black Panthers identified Zimmerman as a Jew and it was Holder’s department that worked hand in hand with them to spread this anti-Semitic falsehood.

The FBI was sent in to determine whether racist motives were discernible in any part of this whole sorry affair not just on the part of Zimmerman but among policeman and prosecutors. Racist motives were found nowhere.

Today those who still want Zimmerman’s head and that seems to include a lot of Democrats are pressuring Holder to bring a federal civil rights charge against Zimmerman. If it were anyone else occupying the office of attorney-general he would swiftly explain that there is no evidence to bring a civil rights charge. The FBI did an investigation. But Holder is man devoid of integrity; he’s looking for a way to railroad Zimmerman and given his devious background, don’t underestimate his ability to find one.

Holder burst on the scene as deputy attorney general in 1997 and it wasn’t long before his actions were condemned by a 95-2 vote in the Senate. He had finessed the clemency of the FALN terrorists from Puerto Rico after talking only to proponents and ignoring victims and law enforcement for two years. Congress incensed demanded answers; Clinton invoked executive privilege; and the Puerto Rican constituency was assured for Hillary seeking election to the Senate.

Next with Janet Reno ill, Holder finessed a pardon for Marc Rich (who died last month), a major tax evader still a fugitive on the lam. For that Holder was hauled before a congressional hearing where his actions were described as “unconscionable.”

I’m not going into the unending list of scandals Holder has been involved in since his appointment as attorney general under Obama. But in his Fast and Furious gun-running program to criminals he’s created a personal My Lai; there are 211 victims so far and there are still many bullets to come.

Like Clinton, Obama had to invoke executive privilege to protect Holder. He then became the first cabinet member in US history to be voted in contempt of Congress for stonewalling. His indifference to providing information on how border patrol agent Brian Terry was killed, and his indifference to the anguish of the family, contrasts sharply with the ocean of crocodile tears he has shed publicly on behalf of Trayvon Martin.

Perhaps the greatest failure of Holder will only be ferreted out by historians or even anthropologists still trying to measure it a century from now. In 2008 there was a major financial crisis in which tons of money was stolen. Holder decided not to allocate resources to bring some of the crooks, many of the biggest in history, to justice. These are donors to the Democratic Party it appears. His excuse stated this year is that charges could threaten the existence of big banks and the world economy. He has personal ties to one corporation benefiting from immunity. Prosecutions of white collar criminals working in financial institutions are at a 20-year low.

You can’t tell me that with the ease technological advances have made for stealing in financial institutions compared to 20 years ago that there are fewer crimes being committed in that sector.

This is the kind of guy Holder is. Unconscionable. Slime.


He is letting a crime wave of monumental proportions go without response and concentrating on persecuting George Zimmerman so like Mussolini he can stand on a balcony and bask in the adoration of the mob. What does this mean to the Jews? Probably nothing. But he’s thrown in his lot with the Black Panthers who are out on the streets rioting trying to portray Zimmerman as a Jew and stirring up racial hatreds in general. Genies once they are out of the bottle sometimes take on a life of their own.



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/17/2013 10:10:08 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1580148
 
Former GOP Senate Candidate Christine O’Donnell Told Her Tax Records Were Breached



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/17/2013 11:52:49 PM
From: one_less  Respond to of 1580148
 
Message 29009770



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/18/2013 6:15:15 AM
From: one_less1 Recommendation

Recommended By
joseffy

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580148
 
Filed under: Actual Civil Rights Violations



We have the story of an 11-year-old girl who was not permitted to enter a museum because her wheelchair might get the carpets dirty.

A woman at the front desk of the Ships of the Sea Museum in Savannah, Georgia, told Dr. Ken Haas that his daughter, Lexi, wouldn’t be allowed to use her wheelchair inside the museum because, I kid you not, it might get the carpets dirty. Dr. Haas pointed out that the wheels of Lexi’s chair couldn’t be any dirtier than his own shoes, but still no dice. The family was offered a wheelchair the museum owns, which presumably has wheels you can eat off of or something.

Like many people who use wheelchairs, Lexi’s was selected to accommodate her specific size and needs. It’s not like wheelchairs are just interchangeable. Lexi has Kernicterus (also called Bilirubin Encephalopathy), a rare brain dysfunction that can be caused by a toxic build-up of bilirubin in the blood in infancy. The bilirubin, or jaundice, left her with irreversible neurological damage that requires a wheelchair that supports her from head to toe.So, no, some random wheelchair owned by the museum, no matter how sparkling its wheels might be, wasn't going to work.

The museum employee then offered (this is the part where I really can’t believe it’s not coming from The Onion) to allow the rest of the family to tour the museum, while Lexi stayed outside and watched a video on a little television screen.

Not surprisingly, the Haas family declined this offer, because that’s not exactly the stuff family vacation memories are made of, is it?

Dr. Haas posted about their experience on Lexi’s public Facebook page, and from there the story got picked up by local and national news.





The Ships of the Sea Museum has issued an apology for the incident, saying that an employee “misunderstood what the museum’s wheelchair policies are.” The museum also terminated the employee, reported WCNC. However, another parent has come forward to say that a similar situation happened at the same museum with her son, who has muscular dystrophy.

I really can’t imagine the lack of understanding it would take to:

a) deny a child entry to a museum;

b) tell a person in a wheelchair they had to switch to a different wheelchair; and

c) tell a family to leave their disabled 11-year-old child outside.

The Haas family has said they aren't planning on filing a complaint under the Americans with Disabilities Act, but that they did want to shed light on the lack of awareness that people with disabilities face.

Make no mistake: people with disabilities, whether visible or not, deal with ignorance on a daily basis. Whether it’s due to poor design, failure to comply with the American Disabilities Act, or the astounding capacity for some people to be complete jack holes, people with disabilities cannot access places that most of us simply take for granted.

Even small actions (or inactions) make public spaces less accessible. Disability rights activist Rachel Cohen-Rottenberg wrote yesterday on her blog, Disability and Representation, about what she calls “microaggressions.” As an example, she relates a recent experience at the post office:

From the way he was walking toward me, it was clear that he assumed that I was just going to get out of his way.

Please bear in mind he was looking at a woman who is 5’1? and uses a bright red cane. The only way he could have missed either of these things is if he were walking toward me backwards. Which he wasn't.

Ms. Cohen-Rottenberg says she would normally step to the side, but it wasn't possible for her to do that in this case without losing her balance.

So I just stopped for a moment, made clear my intention to keep going along the same trajectory, and said, “Excuse me.” I figured that he wouldn't be such a total jerk as to run right into me. And he didn't. Instead, he audibly sighed, stared me down with a look of utter disgust on his face, shook his head as though I had just committed some sort of unthinkable breach of social ethics, and went around me.

I turned around to look at him, and as he walked away, he was still shaking his head as if to say, “What is the world coming to when an able-bodied white man can’t expect people to get out of his way?”

Obviously it’s not the same dynamic at all, but when my twins were babies I had a side-by-side double stroller, just slightly wider than a standard wheelchair. It was truly eye-opening to realize just how many people think they own public spaces, and how many places that appear to be accessible really aren't.



The post office in my town has a ramp, but the door isn't automatic, so it would be impossible to enter unless someone held the door–which isn't always going to happen, because common courtesy is no longer common. Sidewalks in my town are uneven, and on garbage day trash cans block the path. The aisles of the small local stores I wanted to support were impossible to navigate. Even taking my kids into Center City Philadelphia, where the sidewalks are plenty wide, I’d get the evil eye for having my stroller take up space. Also, smokers would carelessly flick ashes wherever they were, not realizing/caring that they were flicking them ONTO MY KIDS.

Although our stroller days are past, our family still deals with random people who think that my autistic kids shouldn't be flapping, stimming, rocking, etc. in public spaces. And I’m also frequently with family and friends when they help their children navigate the world in wheelchairs.

What can I do? What can you do? Well, for starters, those of us who aren't disabled can pay attention. If you haven’t read them, the blogs Disability and Representation and The Body Is Not an Apology can make you far more aware of the insidiousness of discrimination against people with disabilities.

We can speak up. It doesn't have to be a big scene, but when you see someone being rude, call them out for it. I realize that we may not all agree on exactly the right thing to do all the time, but on the other hand sometimes it’s pretty obvious when someone is being a privileged jerk. If you get up to give someone a seat on the subway, and some jackhole snags the seat before the elderly/disabled/pregnant person can even get there, don’t just let it slide. I figure that since that person’s parents didn't sufficiently teach them manners, now the job falls to the rest of us.

Also, and perhaps most importantly, you can raise your kids to use common sense and common decency when it comes to other people. At my kids’ elementary school, the first kid in line holds the door open until the rest of the class is through. They teach the kids to hold the door open for someone whose hands are full, whether they’re full of books or holding onto a cane. It’s one of those little things that doesn't seem like a big deal, except it is. They don’t just walk through and let the door slam in another person’s face. Is it a school’s job to explicitly teach kids to hold the door open for someone? It shouldn't be, but I’m glad they’re doing it.

You can model decent behavior. You probably don’t need to make a big announcement out of it (“Hey kids, look at me stepping aside to give space to that lady using a walker!” “I’m awesome for holding the door for this mom with her hands full of groceries!”) but it is appropriate to talk to your kids about this stuff.

And you can make sure that your kids understand that public space is for everyone. When your child asks you about that person who is different, when your child stares at the kid who is being “weird,” and they will, that’s your chance. That’s when you tell your child that a person in a wheelchair, using a cane, using a wheelchair; a person flapping her hands or mumbling words over and over; a person with a service dog; a person with an assistant: they all have just as much right to be there as you do.

Source:

www.babble.com



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/18/2013 10:24:08 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Jim McMannis
joseffy

  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 1580148
 
IRS Admits It Leaked Christine O'Donnell's Tax Records To Democrats yet no indictments for election f
pjmedia 8 1360



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/18/2013 10:31:21 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
joseffy

  Respond to of 1580148
 
Antwerp: Sharia Sisters responsible for false charges of sexual abuse
[iframe allowtransparency="true" frameborder="0" scrolling="no"
[
Disclaimer: I'm not coming out of retirement.. but I thought this was interesting, and couldn't find an English source to show people.

The story started when a teacher was accused of sexually abusing kindergarten kids in the Antwerp school De Blokkendoos, this past June. For days parents protested outside the school, and finally the school was forced to close a week ahead of the summer vacation. The teacher and administration of the school also received death threats and had to go into hiding. The case has not been officially closed, but the Mayor of Antwerp Bart De Wever recently announced that the teacher had been wrongly accused.

And this is where it gets interesting.

It turns out that the mother who first complained is Najat Mejdoubi, who said the teacher had raped and abused her 4-year old son. Majdoubi is a member of Sharia Sisters, a sister organization of Sharia4Belgium. Dozens of parents joined in the accusations, three turned to the police.

It's not clear whether the hysteria that followed was orchestrated by any organization, but according to a court source, the case fits well with the Sharia4Belgium strategy. "We saw the same phenomenon with the niqab incident in Molenbeek last year. A number of extremists tried to use the De Blokkendoos story to incite the community against everything non-Muslim." The source continued, that though there were protests at the school, the inciters hadn't managed to inflame the rest of the Muslim community, which is to the merit of the Muslim community itself.

The Federal prosecution is investigating whether Sharia Sisters was involved in the death threats. The Antwerp prosecution is still investigating complaints of abuse, though they say that no evidence has been found of it. They refused to comment on the possible involvement of Sharia Sisters and Sharia4Belgium. Three of the parents intend to file a civil case against the teacher.

The 23-year old teacher will not be returning to the school. According to the school administration, it won't be good for the parents, for the other teachers and especially for her. They've found a different school for her, where she'll be teaching next September. They've also given the other teachers the option to change school.

Mayor De Wever advised all victims of the false accusation to file charges against the inciters of the mass hysteria. "In my opinion, those responsible cannot be punished severely enough."



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/18/2013 11:29:13 AM
From: longnshort  Respond to of 1580148
 
The new liberal spin is trayvon had a 3.7 and had a full scholarship to college lololol yeah they hand those out to sophomores all the time and ....wait for it....drumroll....he had 600 hours of community service lololololol yeah court ordered



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (727315)7/18/2013 12:01:20 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
joseffy

  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1580148
 
You won't recognize me. My name was Antonio Santiago and I was the 13-month old child who was shot at point blank range by two teens who were attempting to rob my mother, who was also shot. A Grand Jury of my mommy's peers from Brunswick GA determined the teens who murdered me will not face the death penalty, because they are underage. Too bad I was given a death sentence for being innocent and defenseless, but I was underage too.

My family made the mistake of being half white in a 73% non-white neighborhood, but my murder was not ruled a Hate Crime. (This is only relevant because the make-up of the Sanford FL community, which was misrepresented as being 78% White, was called in to question by the major media outlets. The actual demographics are 50% white, 30% Black in Sanford, not quite what was represented by the media.) Nor did President Obama take so much as a single moment to acknowledge my murder.

I am one of the youngest murder victims in our great Nation's history, but the media doesn't care to cover the story of my tragic demise, President Obama has no children who could possibly look like me - so he doesn't care and the media doesn't care because my story is not interesting enough to bring them ratings so they can sell commercial time slots.

There is not a white equivalent of Al Sharpton because if there was he would be declared racist, so there is no one rushing to Brunswick GA to demand justice for me. There is no White Panther party to put a bounty on the lives of those who murdered me. I have no voice, I have no representation and unlike those who shot me in the face while I sat innocently in my stroller - I no longer have my life.
(Again, the specifics regarding the esteemed Reverend's involvement, as well as that of the Black Panthers and our Nation's leader are what propelled the State of Florida v. George Zimmerman case into the national spotlight.)

So while you are seeking justice for Treyvon, please remember to seek justice for me too. Tell your friends about me, tell you families, get tee shirts with my face on them and make the world pay attention, just like you did for Treyvon.

Thank you.
— in Brunswick, GA.

facebook.com