To: epicure who wrote (71109 ) 2/25/2016 10:52:40 AM From: bruwin Respond to of 71178 What bruwin originally said .... ------------------------" I'm not sure how much damage he could do to America before then" If you haven't already done so, maybe you should at least read what are Donald Trump's positions on 5 rather important considerations for Americans ....donaldjtrump.com -----------------------What epicure, the "Moderator" stated before he/she banned bruwin from the site ... -----------------------"Please ignore troll Bruwin. Elections bring out the worst in the weak minded- no doubt we will see more of the mentally challenged trolling around, because the poor creatures don't feel "heard". Please ignore them. I'll get around to banning them if they are unable to read the thread rules, or unable to resist posting." ----------------------- The thing is, bruwin posted what he posted in an endeavour to discover what those, who very likely were not ardent supporters of Donald Trump, possibly thought of the 5 Positions that Trump had put out there in the PUBLIC domain. Needless to say, in such a circumstance, critics or supporters could freely air their views. Maybe there were those on the Left of the Political spectrum who had not seen those stated Positions, and maybe they could align themselves with some components of those 5 Positions, despite who authored them in the first place. Unfortunately, it seems, at the first sign, or slightest hint, of a possible different point of view or perspective, there are those who rush to the "banning button" before they are prepared to spend a moment or two to enquire as to the original motivation for a post. In addition, there is also the "rush" to place "labels" and to make derogatory and unfounded remarks about the banned such as "Troll" or "weak minded", etc.., etc.. One wonders how many would regard that approach as coming from a "Mature" perspective ?? Rest assured epicure, I am more than willing and prepared to enter into any public debate or discussion with you .... irrespective of your hasty and intolerant manner. I've posted this here, in the same way, and for the same reason, that I posted a reply to your predecessor, Dale Baker, when he adopted much the same intolerant reaction and haste to ban on another of his board's, before he had the good grace to ask a question or two about something of which he had made the wrong assumption ..... .... because the one thing that I'm not prepared to be denied is my RIGHT of reply, and I shall do that, irrespective .....