Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: puborectalis who wrote (727545)	7/18/2013 10:50:01 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580849

>> .screening mammography alone has been highly successful.. Yes, and while it has been shown that annual screenings provide the best results, we've seen a spate of "studies" claiming, "Oh, every two years is fine because it reduces the incidence of false positives." WTF happened to catching it early? Out the window with Obamacare. Your "illustrious career" (LOL) notwithstanding.

To: puborectalis who wrote (727545)	7/19/2013 6:13:21 AM
From: Bill	5 Recommendations Recommended By Brumar89 FJB jlallen longnshort Tenchusatsu Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1580849

Right, you and Dr. Doogie Howser.

To: puborectalis who wrote (727545)	7/19/2013 3:46:49 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	3 Recommendations Recommended By Bonefish Brumar89 longnshort Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1580849

Pubo, As a real physician I can tell you that what you say is pure malarkey......I have saved many lives in my illustrious career from the ravages of cancer... You remember how you often ask why one would pretend to be a doctor? This is why. You cannot respond to i-node's post without bragging about how many lives you have supposedly saved as a "real physician." So why don't you drop the act and actually respond with a real answer? Such as why you think the recommendations of the American Urological Association and the American College of Physicians are "pure malarkey"? By the way, if you're going to respond with your usual "I'm smarter than you" nonsense, don't waste your time. In fact, don't even waste your time trying to convince anyone that you're a "doctor." No one believes you. Not even the libtards on this thread. Tenchusatsu