SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: longnshort who wrote (727981)7/20/2013 6:30:16 PM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1578563
 
Martin Family Attorney: Racist Zimmerman Jury Saw Trayvon as ‘Black Boogeyman’
.........................................................................................................................
The Gateway Pundit ^ | Saturday, July 20, 2013 | Kristinn Taylor


Natalie Jackson, co-counsel for the family of slain Florida teenager Trayvon Martin accused the nearly all white jury that acquitted George Zimmerman in the February 26, 2012 shooting death of Martin in Sanford, Florida of viewing Martin as “the black boogeyman everybody is afraid of.”

The jury was comprised of five white women and one mixed race woman believed to be black-Hispanic.

Jackson made the racially inflammatory charge in an interview with Bright House Networks’ CFNEws 13, a cable TV news channel serving central Florida, broadcast on Wednesday.

Jackson criticized juror B-37, who spoke out this week on CNN, for not identifying with Trayvon Martin as her own child. Jackson compared the juror’s lack of identifying with the 5’11” 158 pound athletic 17 year old black male to the universal sentiment for two year old Caylee Anthony, a central Florida white female found murdered in 2008 whose case similarly garnered obsessive national attention.

While Jackson said “everyone has to accept” the jury’s verdict, she accused the jury of racism and basing their decision on “emotional elements.” Jackson accused juror B-37 specifically of deciding the case on “other things besides the law” for stating her opinion of Zimmerman as a good person.

Asked what she thought changed the jury to vote not guilty after the initial vote of three for acquittal, two for manslaughter and one for second degree murder, and what was missing in the prosecution’s case, Jackson said, “I think there was not a real dialogue on race. I think that the fact that race played a part in this and how even when it came down to the defense putting on a witness who talked about crime at her house, being burglarized in 2011 (note: by two black males while the white woman resident hid in the house with her young child), and that was associated with Trayvon, a person George Zimmerman didn’t even know, that you know to me that, that brought it in. You have a picture of Trayvon shirtless that was shown to the jury–an upshot of a 17 year old body shirtless. You have silhouettes of a hoodie person and silhouettes of George Zimmerman. And that silhouette looked hulking over George Zimmerman. And it was, it was the black boogeyman that everybody’s afraid of.”

Jackson was asked about her expressed confidence before the trial that an all-white jury would convict Zimmerman and what she thinks about that now.

“I’ve always thought it was, I’ve always thought that (the racial make-up of the jury would matter.) The reason I wanted a white jury was because I wanted to see how far we’ve come in America. If people would base their evidence on the information that was presented in trial and base it on the common sense of this case, because I thought if they did that then surely George Zimmerman would be convicted.”

Asked what that meant about America, Jackson said, “I think we’re seeing it with the demonstrations. I think we’re seeing that people are not happy with the justice system, they’re not happy with the way that young black males are thought of in this case. And that’s why it was important to have a white jury. It was important for America to see that people who said, “Surely you can’t do this!” you know, they need to see where we are. This is not a po–we’re not in a post-racial society. Race certainly plays a part in everything that we do in life. And so now, that was to me the reason I wanted the white jury. It was the tough discussion. It was either the confirmation or the disappointment. And many people got the disappointment. And now, let’s talk about it.”

While expressing support for the prosecution in the interview, Jackson went on to reiterate her criticism of the prosecution for taking race out of the case. Jackson also made more direct her accusation that the defense engaged in race-baiting.

“The one thing that I’ve said was missing and I’ve already told you that of this case was that the element of race was taken out. And the only person that presented an element of race was the defense and they presented the ‘scary boogeyman black boy’ to the jury. So I think that if there was any tactical mistake it was that mistake.”

Jackson then went on to accuse the jurors of being liars and racists, “I will submit to you all of them will say that race played no part in this case when we all know that it did.”

Jackson’s blasting of the jury as racist follows softer attacks on the jury made by two of her co-counsels in interviews with Greta Van Susteren, host of the Fox News Channel show On the Record. As an experienced trial attorney, Van Susteren was quite upset with her guests’ attacks on the jury.

Jasmine Rand told Van Susteren she considers herself a “social engineer” more than a lawyer as her reason for seeking to overturn the verdict by rabblerousing for federal prosecution of Zimmerman.

In a subsequent interview with Van Susteren, Daryl Parks attacked juror B-37 over her statements to CNN.

Parks is co-founder of Parks & Crump, the firm representing the Martin family. Rand works for Parks & Crump. Jackson is an independent attorney based in Orlando.

(Transcription of CFNews 13 interview by Kristinn Taylor.)



To: kristinn
These people won’t be satisfied until buildings are burned and there is a white body count.



2 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:12:09 PM by Rebelbase (Tagline: (optional, printed after your name on post):)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
No, the jury saw Trayvon as an angry black youth who assaulted a Hispanic man when shouldn’t have. Responsible parents would have taught Trayvon not to assault people.



3 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:15:20 PM by pallis
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
Hey, so-called attorney. Zimmerman was tried and acquitted. Get over it. There is no double jeopardy.



4 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:15:36 PM by beethovenfan (If Islam is the solution, the "problem" must be freedom.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn

It’s like a clown pulling a never ending handkerchief from his pocket.

Race grievance - the gift that keeps on giving!



5 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:16:14 PM by 101stAirborneVet
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
The thing is...the “boogeyman” doesn’t punch you in the face.



6 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:16:19 PM by JoeDetweiler
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
They could’ve exonerated him based on their mood, what they had for breakfast that day, something their dad once told them or throwing dice in the jury room. It doesn’t matter, it’s over, you can’t try him again, it says so in the Bill of Rights. Get over it, you sick, racist, money-hungry vultures.



7 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:16:54 PM by 2ndDivisionVet (You can't invade the mainland US There'd be a rifle behind each blade of grass.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
One (black) opinion writer referred to Trayvon Martin as a “glistening black buck” which sexually aroused, and frightened, the female jury.

I swear these Leftists are insane.



8 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:16:55 PM by PGR88


To: PGR88
In other news, St. Skittles is still dead.



10 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:18:25 PM by Dead Corpse (I will not comply.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
First rule of going to trial by jury; If you can win the case, try the case. If you can’t win, try everything else. Natalie Jackson knew GZ wasn’t racist but there wasn’t any money in that. I don’t think there was as much money in a GZ conviction. They had to lose to get the money.



11 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:18:37 PM by EandH Dad (sleeping giants wake up REALLY grumpy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: Rebelbase
Just laying the groundwork for a civil suit. Insurer for Zimmerman’s homeowner association has already caved to the tune of $1 million and the Martin’s (or at least their attorneys) are looking for more. With help from Al Sharpton, the NAACP, and even President Obama, a big payout would appear to be in order.



12 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:18:47 PM by Boomer One
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
I listen and I read. The more I listen and the more I read, the only conclusion I can draw is;

These people are like children.

If they do not get their way the will throw a temper tantrum.



13 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:19:07 PM by Tupelo (The Government lies, then the media lies to cover up the government lies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
Proof you do not need to be smart to be an attorney.



14 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:19:17 PM by CodeToad (Liberals are bloodsucking ticks. We need to light the matchstick to burn them off. -786 +969)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
I find her statement astonishingly honest, but her reasoning is flawed. A feral youth, growing up in a thug culture, a theif, drug abuser, often violent and bareley educated... yup; that’s a bogeyman!



15 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:19:17 PM by pingman (Trust a lib? Surely you jest!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
The Democrats are willfully trying to frighten the Americans who are black. They are doing this to keep them voting Democrat. The Democrat party will save the Americans who are black from the Americans who are white. What a crock. What a disgusting thing to do to Americans who are black. It is one of the saddest things I’ve ever seen. I hate to see people manipulated by fear. The slave master cracking the whip to get the slaves to do what he wanted is no different than the Democrat party telling Americans who are black that they need to be afraid of Americans who are white. The slave master and the Democrat leaders are controlling the Americans who are black with fear. It’s shameful and disgusting.



16 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:20:18 PM by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn
Why are we listening to these people? They’re clearly deranged.



17 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:20:58 PM by FrdmLvr (Qui pacem, praeparet bellum.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies | Report Abuse]

To: kristinn



Lots of anger in the TM race-baiting camp. All their plans for civil suits and other moneymakers don't look like such sure things anymore. In fact, just the opposite.

18 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:21:08 PM by JPG (Obama Does Egypt.)


To: kristinn
According to the Martin Family:

This is about race...

then it’s not about race...

then it was about race...

then it’s not about race...

now it’s absolutely about race.

Make up your fool minds. The prosecutor was more consistent than this family.



20 posted on Saturday, July 20, 2013 6:22:04 PM by Bogey78O



To: longnshort who wrote (727981)7/20/2013 7:58:08 PM
From: joseffy1 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1578563
 
Should House Judiciary probe Holder’s potential civil rights violation?