SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/20/2013 9:40:15 PM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
MichaelSkyy
Taro

  Respond to of 1579130
 



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/20/2013 9:40:15 PM
From: jlallen3 Recommendations

Recommended By
FJB
MichaelSkyy
Taro

  Respond to of 1579130
 



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/21/2013 9:36:38 AM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
joseffy

  Respond to of 1579130
 
Freedom From Religion Fanatics Demand Removal of Star of David From Holocaust Memorial: Just when I thought th
legalins 8 440



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/21/2013 10:44:22 AM
From: joseffy  Respond to of 1579130
 
Freedom From Religion Fanatics Demand Removal of Star of David From Holocaust Memorial

Sunday, July 21, 2013
legalinsurrection.com

Just when I thought the anti-religious, anti-First Amendment left couldn’t get any more base, any more insulting, I read this:

The Freedom from Religion Foundation wants the proposed Statehouse Holocaust memorial changed by removing what it sees as the Jewish religious symbolism of the Star of David.

In a June 14 letter to Richard H. Finan, chairman of the Capitol Square Review and Advisory Board, two foundation officials said they have no objections to a Holocaust memorial at the Statehouse. However, architect Daniel Libeskind’s design includes a cut-out version of a 6-pointed star, usually interepreted as the Star of David, a symbol associated with Judiasm. Arguably, that would be a violation of the separation of church and state set out in the U.S. Constitution, the foundation said.

We’ve all seen this regressive leftist fringe group in action before; after all, these Freedom from Religion bullies are the same group involved in the Mojave cross lawsuit and controversy as well as in numerous other lawsuits against public schools, courthouses, and other public buildings and properties.

This whole concept of “freedom from religion” is regressive to its core, and as such, is not only unAmerican but also tyrannical. We’ve watched this group (and the ACLU) sue to have the ten commandments removed from public buildings, to have prayer removed from school meetings (even those held after school hours and with no “impressionable” students present), and to demand that high school football teams and cheerleaders not pray or make any reference to God. All of this is an outrageous affront to all that I stand for, that I believe our country stands for, but to demand that a Star of David not be permitted on a Holocaust memorial simply goes too far.

To deny the Star of David’s presence is to whitewash and rewrite history, and that is not acceptable.






To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/21/2013 10:49:01 AM
From: joseffy  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 1579130
 
Visitors robbed just 4 hrs after arriving in Chicago...



To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/21/2013 11:27:21 AM
From: longnshort2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Brumar89
TideGlider

  Respond to of 1579130
 

How Education, Literacy & the University Came From Christianity & Are Dying Without It: As incredible as it ma



As incredible as it may now seem, the entire history of Western education is steeped in the Christian faith. In fact, it is quite likely that without the foundational work of the Church, the modern world would not exist.

Without exemplary Christians like Charlemagne, Christian missionaries, and their worldview, there would be no modern university. Further,schools for the poor, or literacy programs would probably not have been launched without belief that each person needed to be able to read to access God’s Word.

Ironically, after helping establish the modern world, the formerly Christian-created university systems have been co-opted to be used as a relentless battering ram against faith, church and God. Yet, at the same time intellectual standards have utterly fallen, the West appears on the brink of lapsing into a new Dark Age. If America is to last into the new millennium, we must repent of this move towards darkness, reject our spiritual coma and once again embrace the light of intellectual rigor and the search for truth.

[iframe width="300" height="250" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" vspace="0" hspace="0" allowtransparency="true" scrolling="no" id="aswift_1" name="aswift_1" style="left: 0px; position: absolute; top: 0px;"][/iframe]
I. Literacy—Ancient & ModernIn ancient Greece and Rome there simply were not very many literate people, according to William V. Harris, in Ancient Literacy. The problem was not just a scarcity of manuscripts, but also the paucity offunds available for education. So only a small portion of the population could hope for an education, or to learn to read and write.

The possibility of widespread literacy was not possible until German Johanne Gutenberg’s (1395—1468) invention of the modern printing press, with moveable type. This allowed books to be printed more than one at a time. It is impossible to overstate the importance of this invention. Famously, Gutenberg chose to print the Bible as his magnum opus.

Reformer Martin Luther realized that creation of the moveable-type printing press made possible the widespread dissemination of a vernacular, or German-language Bible, for the common person. He had half a million copies of the German Bibleprinted. Luther did this to help crack the hegemony the Church held over Scripture. Despite not wanting to leave the Church, but merely reform it—his efforts succeeded beyond his wildest dreams. To underscore the point, we can trace the creation of the modern German language to Luther’s works. The same can be said of the vernacular Bibles of France, and England—the King James Version.

Widespread literacy came with religious groups, such as the Puritans, who put great emphasis on reading the Bible as a means of developing a spiritual life and gaining salvation. For example, the American colonists had a higher rate of literacy then their English cousins, as the colonists were undoubtedly more fervent in their beliefs. In many countries around the world, schools for the common man and woman and literacy have only come through Christian missionary work, up till today, according to Dana Robert’s Christian Mission: How Christianity Became a World Religion. Another site states,

We know the story of how, beginning in the 1800s, literacy was spread by missionaries around the world through full or partial Bible translations into roughly 2,500 languages. These efforts are often accompanied by literacy classes and/or mission schools. Catechism through Christian education is still taking place in Africa, India, Korea, many developing cultures and certain Asian countries.

Some more quotes from Robert’s book are notable:

“In many countries, missionaries were the first to insist on the education of girls, despite public opposition.”

“In 1869, Methodist missionary Isabella Thoburn founded a women’s college in India—the first in all of Asia.”

“By 1909… American missionary women were operating 3,263 schools, ranging from primary level to colleges”

“By the early twentieth century, the majority of girls’ schools in Japan, Korea, China, and other locations, had been founded by missionaries despite social prejudice against women’s education”

“In China, Korea, and Japan, women trained in missions schools pioneered women’s higher education”

Overall, modern world literacy is inconceivable without a strong bedrock of religious faith to provide the logic and commitment to spread it.

II. The First SchoolsThe entire theory of advanced education comes out of the Christian worldview. The concept and creation of the university (which have ironically morphed into the most humanistic and anti-Christian of undertakings) was created by Pope Alexander III, in 1179, according to Hunt Janin in The University in Medieval Life, 1179—1499.

Before the Pope directed that the European university system be built, Charlemagne, or Charles the Great, dictated schools be established for the teaching of the Franks. Charlemagne, along with Alfred the Great, is considered the preeminent European king. He was well-noted as a Christian warrior king who relentlessly battled pagan tribes, causing them to bend the knee to Christ, or suffer death. And yet, in his zeal for the good of his people, he also demanded schools be built for the largely illiterate masses.

In 789 King Charles, who would be named Emperor Charlemagne the next year, revealed an ambitious program to reform and improve education. All monasteries and cathedrals were to have schools offering, free of charge, the basic elements of education for any young man who had the ability and self-discipline needed to prepare academically for the priesthood. Charlemagne’s command on schools reads:

Let the priests recruit for these schools not only children from servile families but also the sons of free men. We wish that schools be created to teach children how to read. In the monasteries and in the bishoprics, teach the psalms, how to take notes, hymns, reckoning the dates of movable feasts in the religious calendar, grammar, and studiously correct the religious books because, often, when students want to pray to God they cannot do so because of imperfections and mistakes in these books.

These first cathedral schools averaged about 100 students. The program was overseen by the scholar Alcuin, and was eventually spread across the vast territory that the Franks controlled. Alcuin taught grammar, rhetoric, dialectic and the elements of geometry, astronomy, and music—known as the Seven Liberal Arts. Charlemagne wrote the “Charter of Modern Thought” to inform the Frankish Church of his new educational scheme. Charlemagne wrote that he

“...judged it to be of utility that, in their bishoprics and monasteries committed by Christ’s favour to his charge, care should be taken that there should not only be a regular manner of life, but also the study of letters, each to teach and learn them according to his ability and the Divine assistance…Let there, therefore, be chosen [for the work of teaching] men who are both willing and able to learn and let them apply themselves to this work with a zeal equal to the earnestness with which we recommend it to them.”

III. Start of the UniversitiesOne of the great achievements of mankind is the creation of the medieval university. These were not based upon Greek or Roman models, but produced new, out of whole cloth. French medievalist Jacques Verger wrote:

The university is one of the great creations of the Middle Ages. It became stabilized as a corporative institution linked to the expansion of the cities and destined to become what we now call higher education. The university has continued to develop up to the present time and still remains important

Upon the foundation of public schools by Charlemagne,universities were begun by a dictate of Pope Alexander in 1179. Writes Janin,

In 1179, Pope Alexander III ordered that every cathedral should have a magister (master) who would, free of charge, teach Latin grammar—the cornerstone of academic knowledge in the Middle Ages—to bright but impoverished students.

By the 12th century, three universities had come into being in Europe, the first modern universities. These first three were Bologna, in Italy, which specialized in law; Paris, which dealt with theology and philosophy; and Oxford, which taught mathematics and the beginning sciences.

In the beginning, universities were designed to train the lucky few for careers in the Church. Later, laymen were allowed to attend, as well. The courses were all taught in Latin. The schools taught the received core curriculum from the ancient world of Classical texts, Greek, Roman, Arabic and early Christian authorities Original thought was not prized or encouraged, but the wisdom of past ages was exemplified. The core curriculum became biblical study, which supplanted the ancient Greek interest in philosophy.

What did the first universities teach? Janin describes this:

In medieval universities, theology, which was based on exegesis of the Bible, took over the preeminent role which philosophy had played in the Greek. It was hailed as “Madame la Haute Science” (“My lady the high science”) or as “Lady Theology.” It was the most prestigious and most difficult course of study. The doctrines of the church were supremely important; heresy was a serious and possibly fatal mistake in medieval times. Doctrinal errors were potentially so threatening to a man’s career and livelihood that he was well advised, under the threat of having his teaching license and thus his earning power canceled, to make sure that both his peers and the church approved of what he planned to teach students.’? Indeed, during the later Middle Ages university leaders would continue to stress the traditional, primary role accorded to theology. Jean Gerson, renowned French theologian and chancellor of the University of Paris, held that, in comparison with other academic disciplines, theology must be granted the role of domina (mistress). The other subjects were thus only ancillae (handmaidens) to theology.”

Even the famed scholastic method had a theological foundation, which was later used to branch out into all studies, and therefore provided a foundation for all university curricula, says Janin:

During the high scholastic period (1250 to 1350), scholasticism expanded beyond theology into many other fields. Its ultimate aim was to produce a systematic body of knowledge in every important arena of intellectual enquiry. Scholasticism was, together with the Christian faith, the intellectual powerhouse of medieval universities. Medievalist R. W. Southern said:

“The greatest virtue of the medieval scholastic system was that it stabilized and systematized knowledge of theology and law, which were the subjects of greatest importance for the creation of a fairly orderly and basically hopeful society, and which had been immensely successful in producing works of the highest genius in Christian doctrine, devotion, imagery, and order. The role of the schools was fundamental to their whole effort since they produced the systematic body of doctrine on which a way of life and a body of works of piety and devotion, and of imaginative force, were created which can never lose their power to attract, however much they may lose their power to convince.”

The famed Liberal Arts approach to modern university study was also laid down in the first colleges:

Let us look at the seven liberal arts (artes liberales), which formed the basis for most university studies. These arts were grammar, rhetoric, dialectical reasoning, music, astronomy, geometry, and arithmetic. They were called the “liberal” arts (from liberalis, which has its roots in the Latin word liber, meaning “free”) because they were held to be the proper course of study for free, i.e., non-servile, men. They were considered qualitatively different from and, indeed, much superior to the manual or mechanical arts and also to the practical and more mundane arts of law and medicine.

Lombard’s Sentences, a summary of the Bible, was probably the most influential and most used book from the medieval university.

IV. Intellectual High Points of HistoryIt is an obvious observation that Christian societies have created some of the most outstanding intellectual movements in history. For example, the American Ivy League, long considered the world’s most prestigious university system, was originally founded to train ministers. As one source states,

With some 17,000 Puritans migrating to New England by 1620, Harvard was founded by ministers who realized the need for training clergy for the new commonwealth, a “church in the wilderness.” it was named for John Harvard, its first benefactor. It received its corporate charter in 1650 and became a university in 1780.

In the words of Harvard’s founders:

“After God had carried us safe to New England, and we ... rear’d convenient places for God’s worship ... dreading to leave an illiterate Ministry to the Churches, when our present Ministers shall lie in the Dust ... it pleased God to stir up the heart of one Mr. Harvard, a godly gentleman and a lover of learning ... to give the one half of his estate ... towards the erecting of a college and all his Library.”

Note that America itself was based upon an intellectual tradition which represented the cream of the crop of Europe’s Puritan and Reformed thinkers. This inheritance was used for the American Declaration and Constitution. This religious legacy is perhaps inevitable when one considers that America was founded by men and women seeking a place to freely express their Christian convictions.

Or consider the fact that the modern age’s most influential thinker, John Locke, was wholly influenced by the Bible in nearly all of his philosophy, according to Kim Ian Parker in The Biblical Politics of John Locke. John Locke was influenced by the beginning chapters of Genesis to posit that mankind is naturally in a state of freedom and equality. Locke, who is considered the formative mind behind Classical Liberalism and the Enlightenment, as well as Religious Liberty and Constitutionalism, was perhaps the most influential writer upon America’s Founders.

Bradley Green notes this connection in his The Gospel and the Mind, writing:

...wherever the gospel takes hold of a culture, you inevitably see academies, schools, and institutions of learning develop. They develop not only to teach people how to read and understand the Bible, as important and central as that is. But wherever the gospel goes, it seems to generate intellectual deliberation and inquiry.

Green then proceeds to offer one reason why Christianity creates an intellectually hospitable environment:

One of the key burdens of this book is to suggest that without certain key theological realities and commitments, the cultivation of an enduring intellectual and cultural life becomes increasingly difficult, if not impossible. In short, there is an inseparable relationship between the reality of the gospel and the cultivation of the intellectual life. When the gospel ceases to permeate and influence a given culture, we often see a confused understanding of the possibility of knowledge and the meaning of our thoughts. Ultimately, where the gospel is not holding sway, it should not surprise us to see the subtle or not-so-subtle disintegration of, or rejection of, meaningful intellectual engagement and activity.

V. Intellectual Free-fall: Political Correctness, Literary Theory & Value-Free EducationHaving established that the history of Western education was a Christian undertaking, from beginning to end, we must now inquire—What has happened to American and European learning? A general rot has set in, as the most prestigious and elite universities are caving-in, as if from some hidden termite infestation. What is the cause?

In fact, the cause of the decline of education is quite obvious. Once you have challenged the idea of Truth itself, then what is the point of education? Instead of a search for Truth, education simply becomes another means for advocating for a political position. C. John Sommerville, in The Decline of the Secular University, writes “Universities are not giving us much practice at formulating worldviews, in [their] haste to fit us for our jobs…the academy needs to learn to speak theologically.”

Political Correctness teaches that all important moral decisions are predetermined, and that they all challenge tradition. This is simplistic revolutionary dogma. What a disaster! Literary Theory teaches that texts have no meaning. But if this were true, how could it ever be communicated? Further, wouldn’t that fact alone justify demolishing all schools? Talk about returning to a new Dark Ages!

In fact, the failure of the modern university is also the failure of journalism and of Hollywood. It is a failure of vision. One cannot build a meaningful world out of disbelief and nihilism. Human beings need a positive vision of life, and role models of success and genuine humanity. Until America regains this religious, Christian model, our slide towards collapse will only increasingly gain speed.




To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/21/2013 1:01:17 PM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
TideGlider

  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 1579130
 
Complete list of neighborhood watchman Zimmerman's 43 calls to police from 2004-2012:

  1. 8/12/04: Reports male driving pick-up without car seat
  2. 9/20/04: Neighbor’s garage door open
  3. 8/20/04: Reports white male walking in the road carrying a paper bag, presumably drinking
  4. 3/17/05: Pothole
  5. 4/27/05: Neighbor’s garage door open
  6. 9/21/05: Stray dog
  7. 9/23/05: Couldn’t reach his sister by phone
  8. 11/4/06: Reports pick-up driving around apartment complex for last five minutes “driving real slow looking at all the vehicles in the complex and blasting music”
  9. 6/24/07: Two Hispanic males and one white male loitering near pool; officer spoke to them and determined were locked out of their vehicle
  10. 10/14/07: Possible intentional damage to his car tire; thinks he knows who did it
  11. 11/25/07: Reports disturbance involving his ex-roommate, a white male
  12. 1/5/09: Fire alarm going off
  13. 3/12/09: Requests patrol outside his home for a week while he’s away
  14. 5/4/09: Reports blue Audi; unclear why
  15. 6/10/09: Fire alarm going off
  16. 6/16/09: People jumping over the fence and going into the pool area, playing basketball, trashing the bathroom; reports make and model of car
  17. 8/21/09: Disturbance involving landlord over rent and foreclosure
  18. 8/26/09: Male driving without headlights
  19. 9/7/09: Pothole
  20. 9/22/09: Speed bike doing wheelies, speeding and weaving in and out of traffic
  21. 10/23/09: Pitbull
  22. 11/21/09: Referring to unclear past event, GZ says subject is in front of his residence
  23. 11/3/09: White male driver in county vehicle cutting people off
  24. 1/1/10: White male having loud verbal dispute with female in back of pick-up
  25. 1/12/10: Neighbor’s garage door open, “very unlike his neighbor”
  26. 2/27/10: Reports residence in complex where multiple vehicles are constantly coming to the residence; unknown subjects run out to the vehicles and run back inside; the subjects are always outside with the garage open and hang out all night, an ongoing problem; unknown who lives at that address; GZ advises there are constantly different people
  27. 4/28/10: Vehicle obstructing road
  28. 6/12/10: At least 50 subjects GZ doesn’t think live at complex are in the clubhouse& pool areas having a party, causing road obstructions
  29. 6/26/10: Approximately 50 subjects are having a loud party and blocking the street
  30. 10/2/10: Female driver yelling at elderly passengers, unknown if altercation is physical, vehicle was rocking back and forth
  31. 11/8/10: Trash in roadway, appears to contain glass
  32. 11/26/10: Motion alarm tripped while GZ is out of town
  33. 3/18/11: Pitbull in his garage
  34. 4/22/11: Black male 7-9 years old walking alone unsupervised on busy street; GZ “concerned for well being”
  35. 5/27/11: GZ’s alarm tripped while he’s at work
  36. 8/3/11: Black male on foot at back entrance of neighborhood last seen wearing white tank top and black shorts; GZ believes he’s involved in recent burglaries in neighborhood; GZ says he matches the description that was given to police
  37. 8/6/11: Two black male teens near back gate of neighborhood, one wearing black tank top and black shorts, 2nd wearing black t-shirt and jeans; GZ says they’re the ones who have been burglarizing the area and predicts subjects will run into the subdivision next to his complex
  38. 9/23/11: Open garage door; GZ notes he’s part of neighborhood watch and is concerned about recent burglaries in area; had a neighborhood watch meeting previous night with Sgt. Herx who advised him to report anything suspicious
  39. 10/1/11: Two black males approx 20-30 years old appear to be loitering in their car at gate of community at 1 am; GZ doesn’t recognize subjects or vehicle and is concerned due to recent burglaries in the area
  40. 12/10/11: White male with shaved head at club house in black Mercedes was hired by GZ to serve food at an event but then GZ replaced him and subject seemed upset and wants to be paid; GZ has never met him in person; GZ’s wife will meet with police when they arrive
  41. 1/29/12: Five or six kids, ages 4-11 years, running and playing in the street and running out in front of cars
  42. 2/2/12: Black male wearing black leather jacket, black hat, and printed PJ pants keeps going to the residence of a white male; unclear what he’s doing; subject was gone when police arrived
  43. 2/26/12 : Black male, late teens, dark gray hoodie, jeans or sweatpants, walking around area; GZ concerned about recent burglaries

......

Of the twelve incidents in which race was given, six, including the incident reporting TM, involved black males (#34, 36, 37, 39, 42, 43), 5 involved white males (#3, 11, 23, 24, 40), and one involved two Hispanic males and one white male (#9).
.............
Of the six incidents involving black males, one, recall, is the one in which GZ reports that he is concerned about the well being of a black male child who is wandering a busy street without adult supervision. So we’re talking about five incidents involving black males GZ found suspicious, and one involving a black male he wanted to help.
........
thefacultylounge.org




To: J_F_Shepard who wrote (728028)7/21/2013 1:12:37 PM
From: longnshort1 Recommendation

Recommended By
FJB

  Respond to of 1579130
 
Obama: African-Americans Are Incapable of Acting as Citizens of the United States
thinker 8 345

It is with sadness that I witnessed the president of the United States tell the world that African-Americans are incapable of functioning as responsible citizens at the most basic level.

Our first White African American leader said:

You know, when Trayvon Martin was first shot I said that this could have been my son. Another way of saying that is Trayvon Martin could have been me 35 years ago. And when you think about why, in the African American community at least, there's a lot of pain around what happened here, I think it's important to recognize that the African American community is looking at this issue through a set of experiences and a history that doesn't go away.

There are very few African American men in this country who haven't had the experience of being followed when they were shopping in a department store. That includes me. There are very few African American men who haven't had the experience of walking across the street and hearing the locks click on the doors of cars. That happens to me - at least before I was a senator. There are very few African Americans who haven't had the experience of getting on an elevator and a woman clutching her purse nervously and holding her breath until she had a chance to get off. That happens often.

And I don't want to exaggerate this, but those sets of experiences inform how the African American community interprets what happened one night in Florida. And it's inescapable for people to bring those experiences to bear. The African American community is also knowledgeable that there is a history of racial disparities in the application of our criminal laws - everything from the death penalty to enforcement of our drug laws. And that ends up having an impact in terms of how people interpret the case.



Although he would know best whether he, 35 years ago, would be adjudged a thug and potential murderer who could be stopped from taking the life of another only by being shot, it is another thing to indict an entire group as incapable of behaving as citizens.

In a court of law:

... the jury is to determine the facts of this case. You are the sole and exclusive judges of the facts. You alone determine what evidence to accept, how important any evidence is that you do accept, and what conclusions to draw from all the evidence. You must apply the law as I give it to you to the facts as you determine them to be, in order to decide whether the Commonwealth has proved the defendant guilty of this charge (these charges).

You should determine the facts based solely on a fair consideration of the evidence. You are to be completely fair and impartial, and you are not to be swayed by prejudice or by sympathy, by personal likes or dislikes, toward either side. You are not to allow yourselves to be influenced because the offense(s) charged is (are) popular or unpopular with the public...

In short, you are to confine your deliberations to the evidence and nothing but the evidence[.] ...

Your verdict must be based solely on the evidence developed at trial. It would be improper for you to consider any personal feelings about the defendant's race, religion, national origin, sex or age.

It would be equally improper for you to allow any feelings you might have about the nature of the crime to interfere with your decision.



(The above are jury instructions from the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, yet they can still be considered representative of the duties with which juries are charged. Check out others if you like.)

Generally, jury duty is a right/responsibility of citizenship.

To plainly state that "the African-American community is looking at this issue [and presumably others] through a set of experiences and a history that doesn't go away" is to plainly state that the African-American community is incapable of serving on a jury where a verdict is based solely on the application of the relevant law to the evidence developed at trial.

No more. No less.

No "baggage" influencing the call.

No sets of experiences, no histories.

"No nothing."

Justice is blind.

Since, according to Obama, the experiences and history do not go away, then these "personal feelings" are inescapable.

Though he did not truly explicate his apparently damning of others andof blacks statements re: department stores, locks clicking, and purse-clutching, he did offer a reason:

... African American young men are disproportionately involved in the criminal justice system; that they're disproportionately both victims and perpetrators of violence.



Of note, BHO chose not to offer Jesse's seemingly similar feelings toward blacks that would make the reactions Obama seems to condemn near universal:

There is nothing more painful to me ... than to walk down the street and hear footsteps and start thinking about robbery, then look around and see somebody white and feel relieved.



(Whites + White Hispanics (ask the media) + African-Americans = just about everybody = near-universal.)

Given the above, it seems odd that Obama would indict all others from being what is arguably cautious and protective of their lives and property from a group that "disproportionately" includes "perpetrators of violence" (and possibly other crimes).

It is also a bit odd that he discussed whether Trayvon would have been justified in shooting George if Zimmerman had been in a car following Martin. Perhaps a better question would have been whether Martin would have been justified in shooting Zimmerman if George had been pounding Trayvon's head on the cement.

The bottom line is that Obama has chosen to disenfranchise blacks wholesale from the right/responsibility to serve as jurors -- i.e., to act as responsible citizens -- by labeling them as persons incapable of deciding cases on the merits.

We will have to see if Judge Rosemarie Aquilina will bar the empaneling of blacks in order to prevent "not honoring the president."

Michael Applebaum is a medical doctor and lawyer practicing in Chicago.

Read more: americanthinker.com
Follow us: @AmericanThinker on Twitter | AmericanThinker on Facebook