SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Clown-Free Zone... sorry, no clowns allowed -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Terry Maloney who wrote (424476)7/22/2013 8:05:08 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Respond to of 436258
 
The R's are just gatekeepers now. The D's are running the full scale purges.

Even Cuba is running a-skeered of the Obama drones.

By my count, it's Boliva, Ecuador...maybe Venezuela ....only countries left with balls.



To: Terry Maloney who wrote (424476)7/22/2013 8:28:52 PM
From: Broken_Clock  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 436258
 
Sounds like O gets his rocks offs on drone strikes....

I can see it now, "Hey Leon, you got good video on that last one?"

Who Makes the Call?On June 15, 2012, the Obama administration, in a letter to Congress, publicly acknowledged the existence of military actions in Yemen and Somalia against individuals alleged to be linked to Al Qaeda.[56] However, the administration has not provided similar statements about CIA activities (including drone programs) in Pakistan and Yemen.[57] As a result, what little public information exists about government perspectives, programs, and policies has come largely through anonymous sources and leaks in major news outlets. In May 2012, three such stories—one by the New York Times,[58] one by the Associated Press,[59] and one byNewsweek reporter and author Daniel Klaidman[60]—revealed the most information to date about how the decision to kill a particular target is made.

According to the Associated Press and the New York Times, the President acts as the final decision maker, at least with respect to the decision to carry out “personality strikes” targeting named individuals. According to the New York Times, early in his presidency, “the president tightened standards, aides say: If the agency did not have a ‘near certainty’ that a strike would result in zero civilian deaths, Mr. Obama wanted to decide personally whether to go ahead.” [61] Newsweekreporter Daniel Klaidman noted that, “Obama followed the CIA operations closely” [62] and that he would frequently pull aside CIA director Leon Panetta “and ask for details about particular strikes.” [63]

Both the CIA and the US Special Operations Command, [64] the latter through its Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC)—have their own target lists. Those lists are drawn up through independent processes, but significant overlap often exists.[65] The administration claims to have a thorough vetting process by which names are chosen. It is unclear what, if any, process is in place for decisions regarding the so-called “signature strikes,” which are particularly problematic and open to abuse and mistake. [66] These strikes target individuals or groups “who bear characteristics associated with terrorism but whose identities aren’t known.” [67]

livingunderdrones.org