To: Cogito Ergo Sum who wrote (102031 ) 7/25/2013 9:36:38 PM From: GPS Info Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 217825 All US need do is take water from any border lake.. what is Canada going to do[?] They can complain to the UN, if they can make it to NYC.<g>yeah what are the odds :O) Not in my lifetime likely but that's probably only 30 years at the outside. Well OK, any country may do something extreme when its back is against a wall. My normal mode is to consider cases with the highest probabilities and then work my way down the list. For the US to forcibly take water from a common source with Canada seems possible, but I can't see it happening in the next 30 years, so we probably agree there. It seems more likely that the US would work out a payment scheme with Canada. I would also wonder about advances in desalination techniques which will be developed over these same 30 years. Imagine if we decided to reduce the flow to the Columbia on Canada's side LOL.. Loss of water for irrigation.. potential. massive loss of hydro power... This, I don't understand. What percent of the Columbia River would be affected by diverting the water within Canada? Washington State receives plenty of rainfall and a significant amount of that flows into the Columbia. The Snake River also flows into the Columbia from Idaho and Wyoming. There is a LOT of water in the Columbia getting to the Pacific. Where would this diverted water go within Canada? I have heard interesting comments from Canadians in my travels about the influence and power of the US. During one visit to BC, a man suggested to me that because of the separatist movements, if a breakup of Canada did occur, the US should claim BC to have a physical connection to Alaska. Supposedly, we would have the support of the locals. Others have commented about the poor condition of roads just north of the border compared to south of the boarder. Personally, I have never heard or read of anyone in the US wanting to take something from Canada without paying for it. Why piss off a good neighbor? There was a time when the US allowed slavery, and women couldn't vote, and children worked in dangerous factories. The US also took land from Mexico and invaded Canada, but didn't stay there long. In WWII the US firebombed civilian targets in Dresden and Tokyo. Many things have changed since then. I can't justify US actions before WWII, but I think that the US and all other nations must justify what they do since becoming signatories of the UN Charter. This is my demarcation point of "no return" for nations. I can't accept excuses for a nation's actions because some other county did something similar back in 1830. Maybe in the next 30 years US finally collapses financially and politically and breaks with the United Nations. Canada might become a safe haven and temperate after the icecaps melt. It could then become the new world superpower with other areas of a broken US. I shudder at the thought.<g>