Sexter says Weiner even lousy at phone sex
... “She told me in discussions that the phone sex was not good with Anthony Weiner because he would have an orgasm . . . within a 30-second period,” said Leathers confidante Nik Richie, according to the Huffington Post.
....
“She said the phone sex sucked,” Richie later told The Post. “He would get off and she would be [left] hanging.”
Richie’s Web site, thedirty.com, broke the news of the Leathers-Weiner relationship Monday.
“They would have phone sex religiously, talking sometimes twice a day,” Richie, told The Post.
Leathers, a 23-year-old Indiana political campaign volunteer, has confirmed she was Weiner’s online sex partner for about six months in 2012.
In an interview with “Inside Edition,” Leathers said Weiner told her he loved her, and she believed him.
She sent nearly 30 steamy photos to Weiner under his pseudonym “Carlos Danger” during their Web fling.
Meanwhile, Weiner yesterday defiantly ignored growing calls for him to drop out of the race.
“This is background noise,” he insisted, dismissing his pervy postings as a thing of the past.
Asked to clarify how many women he exchanged racy messages with, Weiner first said, “I don’t have a specific number for you.”
Urged by The Post to do the math on how many women he sexted while in office, he said, “Six to 10, I suppose — but I can’t tell you absolutely what someone else is going to consider appropriate or not.”
“I said there were multiple women over an extended period of time,” Weiner added.
“It’s not dozens and dozens.”
Then, as if taking a page right out of the Bill Clinton playbook, Weiner all but challenged reporters to define “sext.”
“I said at the time of my resignation there were six,” he said.
“I don’t think, in total, there are any more. Here’s the problem: There are people that I had exchanged with that are appropriate and there are no pictures and no illicit texts or anything like that.
“Now, if those people want to say they don’t like the exchanges we had either, I don’t know where to put them.
“Sometimes, they didn’t go consistently, whatever,” he said. “It’s behind me. It’s a year ago at least. And I worked through those things.
“If people want to reveal information, they are welcome to do it,” he sniped. “I won’t go back and forth with the people at the other end of these texts.”
The prickly politician insisted his sexual exchanges with strangers online or in texts isn’t an addiction.
“I don’t believe it is,” he said.
“The people I’m working with don’t believe it is. I want to have some modicum of privacy between me and the people that are offering me this help, but the answer is ‘no.’ ”
“I sought help. I got help,” Weiner said.
He was vague about exactly what kind of “help” he got.
“I talked about it extensively in the New York Times story, 8,000 some-odd words,” Weiner said.
“I sought the help of my wife. And, like problems that people have, this one, thankfully, is behind me. And this one hasn’t reoccurred.
“The facts, to a large degree, have not changed.”
Weiner also continued to maintain he’s been honest about his missteps.
“When I announced for mayor and had conversations with many people, many citizens, just about any member of the press that wanted to ask me these questions, I said that these things were behind me. They were then. They are now,” he said.
“Now citizens have to decide whether this personal behavior — when one thing happened or it didn’t happen — is important to them.
“I understand that. All I’m saying is that these things were personal in nature. I’ve worked them out between me and my wife and I’ve gotten them behind me.
“They’re been behind me for some time now,” he said. “And it wasn’t until they were behind me that I decided to run for mayor.
...
nypost.com |
