Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Gold/Mining/Energy : Northern Abitibi Mining (NAI-ASE) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Zardoz who wrote (149)	12/7/1997 10:16:00 PM
From: Buckey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 773

Thanks, Hutch: I realize the amount was low. So in theory they could have their sell orders already in while they are still buying. I as an individual investor cannot have orders on both sides for a given security but trading houses can have "house orders" or "broker orders" or whatever you call them on both sides. (I should have studied when I took that "Investment analysis and portfolio management" course) If this is the case, it demonstrates a further inequity and disadvantage the individual investor is at.

To: Zardoz who wrote (149)	12/16/1997 2:32:00 PM
From: Buckey	Respond to of 773

Hutch, Gonna take our talk over here. To anyone that cares we have been on the CRN thread discussing Canacrook. Looks like we may have CC and Whoreton at odds here. Spams been driving it up to 64/65 cents. Then at 12:15 Alberta time whoreton dumps a whole bunch and drives it back down to 62 cents. Whoretom did the same thing this a.m. on DML. No way these are retail trades. If I am a shareholder and NAI is moving up I sure as heck am not going sell out at 1,2,3 cents below the last sale after the upticks. This is the DML post Message 2977214