Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: one_less who wrote (729591)	7/29/2013 2:08:14 PM
From: Tenchusatsu	2 Recommendations Recommended By PKRBKR TideGlider Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1572574

Less, I was outspoken in that regard myself. It is nothing short of a criminal sin to target innocents in order to create some secondary harmful effect on your true enemy. If a man commits a felony, you arrest that person, try him, and throw him in jail. If that man turned out to be the sole provider of a kid, what are you going to do? Blame the father's incarceration for the kid now growing up without a parent? Of course not, you blame the father himself for being a felon. Same thing with Saddam Hussein. If he's constantly defying the U.N., sanctions are going to be levied. If that hurts the people of Iraq, that's on Saddam himself, not on the sanctions. Blaming the sanctions ignores the reasons why they were imposed in the first place. If the reasons are no longer valid, then lift the sanctions via due process. Tenchusatsu